🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the challenge that stealthy backdoor attacks in federated learning evade detection by single-signal defenses. To this end, we propose FedMAST, a defense framework integrating multi-axis structural tracing, squeeze-pair coherence scoring, and signed spectral drift tracking. By synergistically capturing coupled feature distortions and persistent directional shifts across structural, spectral, and historical dimensions, FedMAST suppresses malicious updates through a hierarchical filtering mechanism. Experimental results demonstrate that FedMAST reduces the average attack success rate to 1.51% while maintaining a main-task accuracy of 94.84%, significantly outperforming existing baseline methods.
📝 Abstract
Federated learning enables distributed training without requiring clients to share their raw data. However, its reliance on the integrity of the client-submitted updates exposes the global model to stealthy backdoor poisoning. Existing defenses often rely on individual evidence sources, but stealth-constrained attacks can adapt to these signals. Such attacks can suppress anomaly signals they are optimized to evade, yet their poisoned updates still leave residual structural traces. We propose FedMAST, a Federated Multi-Axis Structural Tracing defense for backdoor detection in federated learning. FedMAST scores client updates using complementary structural, spectral, and historical evidence and then applies tiered filtering and round-level containment to limit adversarial influence. To capture traces that isolated signals may miss, FedMAST uses squeeze-pair coherence scoring to expose coupled feature distortions and signed spectral-drift tracking to reveal persistent directional changes over time. Across six backdoor attacks, FedMAST achieves lower attack success rate (ASR) than baseline defenses in all nine evaluated comparisons, averaging 1.51% ASR and 94.84% main-task accuracy (MTA) across the complete 200-round runs. Over the full 200-round method-aware CovertLayers run, FedMAST achieves 1.53% ASR and 92.26% MTA, compared with ASRs of 100.00%, 99.67%, 99.53%, and 32.84% for FedAvg, MultiKrum, AlignIns, and FLAME, respectively.