🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the challenge of LoRA merging in replay-free continual learning, where performance is highly sensitive to merging coefficients and severe interference arises among task vectors. To mitigate these issues, this work proposes a proximity-regularized merging strategy. We theoretically demonstrate that merging performance depends fundamentally on the intrinsic mergeability of task vectors rather than solely on scaling coefficients. Accordingly, a proximity penalty is introduced during training to optimize this property, complemented by a Fisher-weighting mechanism to suppress parameter interference. The proposed approach significantly improves average accuracy across diverse scenarios, effectively broadens the stable range of merging coefficients, and achieves a favorable balance between model stability and plasticity.
📝 Abstract
Rehearsal-free continual learning with parameter-efficient adapters can be cast as a sequence of task-vector write-in operations: for each new task, a low-rank adapter is learned and merged into a running model. We propose Proximity Regularized Merging (PRM), a minimal modification to sequential LoRA merging that adds a proximal penalty during task-vector training without changing the subsequent write-in rule. PRM acts as a robust task-vector regularizer: in the reported Base->+Prox diagnostics, it improves AAA across multiple write-in rules, backbones, and class-incremental settings, while its fixed-coefficient variant remains competitive with strong coefficient-based baselines. Mechanistically, matched-prefix norm controls and proximal-strength sweeps show that proximal training shrinks the task-vector radius, lowers Fisher-weighted interference, broadens the coefficient plateau, and exposes a stability-plasticity trade-off. Together, these results suggest that the effectiveness of sequential LoRA merging depends not only on how much of a task vector is written in, but also on whether the task vector itself has been trained to be mergeable.