Assurance-Scoped Reliability for Agentic Networks: Capturing the State That Matters

πŸ“… 2026-07-29
πŸ“ˆ Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
πŸ“„ PDF
πŸ€– AI Summary
Existing reliability metrics struggle to effectively detect latent failures in agent networks caused by stale information, redundant operations, partial execution, or silent degradation. To address this limitation, this work proposes the Reliability Assurance Intelligence (RAI) architecture, which introduces, for the first time, a scope-oriented reliability mechanism that unifies the modeling of correctness, auditability, and recoverability of intent execution. The architecture captures assurance requirements through service reliability profiles, persists critical runtime states via context capsules, and integrates generic runtime functions with deterministic service lifecycle management. Experimental results demonstrate that RAI accurately captures and validates essential states in agent lifecycle management scenarios, significantly enhancing the system’s capability to assure reliability.
πŸ“ Abstract
Agentic networks transform accepted intents into operational services through autonomous reasoning, adaptive planning, tool use, and cross-domain coordination, but these capabilities introduce failure modes that conventional reliability measures do not fully capture. An accepted intent may still be carried out incorrectly, for example because the system acts on stale information, repeats an external action, applies only part of a change, or enters a fallback mode that quietly relaxes policy enforcement. Such failures can leave a service running and apparently healthy while its behavior is unsafe or unaccountable, with too little evidence to detect, explain, or recover from them. This article proposes Reliability Assurance Intelligence (RAI), a general assurance architecture for such systems. From the service description, RAI derives a per-service reliability profile that states what must be checked, recorded, recovered, and audited. At runtime, generic functions use the service profile to retain the durable state needed for recovery and accountability in a context capsule adapted to service conditions. Using an agentic lifecycle manager for deterministic network services as a running example, we design the RAI architecture and propose a methodology for validating its reliability assurances.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

agentic networks
reliability
failure modes
accountability
assurance
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Reliability Assurance Intelligence
agentic networks
context capsule
reliability profile
assurance-scoped reliability
πŸ”Ž Similar Papers
No similar papers found.