CLAIRE: A Schema-Grounded Hybrid Workflow for Healthcare Administrative Form Completion

📅 2026-09-26
📈 Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the inefficiency and error-proneness of information extraction in medical form filling by proposing CLAIRE, a hybrid workflow. The method adopts a "schema-grounded, verification-first" architecture that automates form completion through field state discovery, source-to-field mapping, deterministic validation, and audit trails. Large language models from the Qwen series are restricted to assisting with mapping tasks without authorization for critical operations, while a bounded error-correction mechanism ensures data rigor. Benchmark evaluations demonstrate that CLAIRE achieves both a success rate and an accuracy of 1.000, substantially reducing the burden of manual review and enhancing processing throughput.
📝 Abstract
Healthcare administrative staff transfer structured information from electronic health records, referrals, claims systems, provider rosters, and work queues into dynamic forms. We developed and evaluated CLAIRE (Clinical Language and Agentic Intelligence for Reasoning and Entry), a hybrid workflow that separates field-state discovery, source-to-field mapping, deterministic validation, bounded correction, escalation, and audit tracing. We tested five synthetic healthcare administrative schemas, 1,000 source records, four interface variants, two data-quality suites, and six comparators, yielding 24,000 benchmark episodes. A separate strict-output audit evaluated direct mappings from Qwen2.5-1.5B and Qwen2.5-7B, and a trace-derived operational simulation covered 6,000 episodes. Under the evaluated synthetic benchmark conditions, full CLAIRE achieved 1.000 episode success, field accuracy, required-field completion, and dependency completion in both suites; removing validation reduced stress-suite success to 0.500. In the simulation, 100.0% of clean and validation-stress episodes reached a staff-reviewable draft, compared with 68.6% of escalation challenge episodes, unsupported cases were blocked. Scenario-based savings were 149.7-165.5 seconds per case, not observed staff times. The findings support schema-grounded, validation-first healthcare administrative automation in which language-model components assist mapping but do not authorize unsupported or consequential actions.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

healthcare administrative automation
form completion
electronic health records
data quality
schema-grounded mapping
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Schema-Grounded Workflow
Hybrid Automation
Deterministic Validation
Healthcare Administration
Agentic Intelligence
🔎 Similar Papers