Novice Reliance Calibration in AI-Assisted Decision Making: The Role of Explanations and Self-Assessment

πŸ“… 2026-10-06
πŸ“ˆ Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
πŸ“„ PDF
πŸ€– AI Summary
This study addresses the challenge that novice users struggle to calibrate their reliance on AI systems in scenarios lacking immediate feedback, thereby increasing the risk of over-reliance. To investigate this, we extend the concept of reliance calibration to human-AI collaboration contexts without real-time signals. Through a between-subjects experiment involving a clinical entity extraction task, we examine how AI-generated explanations and metacognitive self-assessment influence novices’ reliance calibration. Our findings reveal a counterintuitive effect: providing explanations can paradoxically induce over-reliance, whereas a deeper understanding of the task facilitates selective reliance. Based on these insights, we propose system design guidelines tailored for environments without immediate feedback, offering empirical evidence to optimize human-AI collaborative tools.
πŸ“ Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools are widely used to support decision making in tasks and domains where no immediate performance feedback is available. In these settings, users cannot learn to adjust their reliance behavior over time through trial and error. However, little is known about how novice users calibrate reliance on AI when external feedback is unavailable, or whether AI explanations can support calibration in its absence. We introduce reliance calibration as an organizing construct for studying how novice users dynamically adjust reliance behavior, and examine how AI explanations and meta-cognitive self-assessment shape it. Through a between-subjects study with 110 participants completing a clinical entity extraction task with AI assistance and limited performance feedback, we observe that novice users exhibit systematic drift toward over-reliance in the presence of explanations, while higher self-reported task understanding is associated with more selective reliance behavior. These results extend reliance calibration research into human-AI collaboration contexts without real-time performance signals and present actionable guidelines on designing AI tools that must support appropriate reliance in these settings.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

reliance calibration
AI-assisted decision making
novice users
explanations
self-assessment
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Reliance Calibration
AI-Assisted Decision Making
Explainable AI
Over-reliance
Meta-cognitive Self-assessment
πŸ”Ž Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
πŸ’Ό Related Jobs
No related jobs found.
Eun Jeong Kang
Eun Jeong Kang
Cornell University
AI-mediated communicationHuman-AI interaction
P
Peter (Xianpi) Duan
McMaster University
S
Swati Mishra
McMaster University