Residual Diffusion Implicit Models

📅 2026-09-26
📈 Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the limitations of diffusion models in solving inverse problems, including noise initialization mismatch, hallucination artifacts in bridging models, and the lack of variance modeling in consistency models. To this end, we propose a Residual Diffusion Implicit Model that explicitly models the residual between high- and low-quality images to align with real degradation processes. The method introduces a non-Markovian implicit reverse sampler for single-step reconstruction and designs a controllable variance mechanism to balance fidelity and diversity, jointly optimized via perceptual loss. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed model outperforms state-of-the-art methods in denoising and super-resolution tasks across metrics such as PSNR, significantly suppressing artifact generation while requiring minimal sampling steps.
📝 Abstract
Diffusion models achieve state-of-the-art results across multiple tasks. However, in inverse problems, standard initialization from pure Gaussian noise misaligns the generative process with real-world degradations. More recent methods such as diffusion bridges impose strict endpoint constraints and often require long reverse processes that are prone to hallucinations. Alternative consistency models provide noise-invariant, one-step mappings but lack inherent variance modeling and can degrade under severe corruption. Hence, residual diffusion implicit models (RDIMs) are proposed, constituting a generalized framework that explicitly models the residuals between high-quality (HQ) and low-quality (LQ) images, aligning the forward process with the actual degradation. A non-Markovian implicit reverse sampler is derived, which can skip intermediate timesteps, enabling accurate few-step or even single-step reconstruction, while mitigating the hallucinations inherent to long diffusion chains. RDIM also introduces a controllable variance mechanism that interpolates between deterministic and stochastic sampling, balancing fidelity and diversity. Furthermore, it enables the straightforward use of perceptual losses, when needed. Experiments on denoising and super-resolution benchmarks demonstrate that RDIMs consistently outperforms the state of the art, including bridge and consistency models, in terms of PSNR, SSIM, and LPIPS, reducing hallucinations while requiring only a few sampling steps (often just one). The results position RDIMs as an efficient solution for a broad range of image restoration tasks.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Inverse Problems
Image Restoration
Diffusion Models
Hallucination
Degradation Alignment
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Residual Diffusion Implicit Models
Non-Markovian Reverse Sampler
Controllable Variance Mechanism
Inverse Problems
Image Restoration
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
J
João Guerreiro
INESC-ID, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
P
Pedro Tomás
INESC-ID, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
H
Helena Aidos
LASIGE, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
Jacinto C. Nascimento
Jacinto C. Nascimento
Institute for Systems and Robotics (ISR/IST), LARSyS, Instituto Superior Técnico
Signal ProcessingMachine LearningComputer VisionRobotics