DA-GRD: Decision-Aware Grasp-Relevant Disambiguation for tactile recovery under perception-to-execution mismatches

📅 2026-09-24
📈 Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the failure of visually pre-planned grasps caused by object displacement and the difficulty of recovery without visual feedback. To overcome this, it proposes a decision-aware grasp disambiguation framework that maintains a belief distribution over object poses and employs information gain to drive sparse tactile exploration. Rather than pursuing full object relocalization, the method terminates upon identifying a feasible shared grasp. Evaluations in both MuJoCo simulations and real-world experiments demonstrate that the proposed approach significantly outperforms baselines. In simulation, it achieves an 84.7% physical grasping success rate with only 4.13 exploratory touches on average, while real-world trials yield a 71.7% success rate. These results highlight substantial improvements in interaction efficiency under vision-deprived conditions.
📝 Abstract
Grasping is a fundamental robotic capability that bridges perception and physical task execution. This paper studies grasp pose recovery under a perception-to-execution mismatch, where a grasp generated from visual perception may become spatially stale if the object moves before execution, using only sparse tactile interactions and no further visual observations. We propose DA-GRD, Decision-Aware Grasp-Relevant Disambiguation, which maintains a weighted planar belief over possible object configurations and selects tactile probes according to their ability to eliminate hypotheses and improve agreement among candidate task grasps. Rather than fully relocalizing the object, DA-GRD stops when the remaining hypotheses support a common executable grasp. In MuJoCo experiments on ten rigid objects with translations up to 5~cm and yaw perturbations up to $\pm45^\circ$, DA-GRD achieves an 84.7% physical lift success rate, compared with 9.1% for stale AnyGrasp, 21.2% for the original fix-scan baseline, and 63.7% for fix-scan method adapted with an SE(2) belief. DA-GRD also achieves a 57.3% Task conditioned Success rate. Across objects, it uses a success-average of 4.13 tactile probes over the ten per-object means, corresponding to a 72.5% reduction relative to the fixed 15-probe baselines. Real-world experiments on six objects achieve 71.7% physical lift success and 38.3% task-conditioned success with 4.20 probes on average. These results show that tactile sensing can recover task-relevant grasps under vision-off conditions with limited physical interaction, without requiring complete object localization.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

grasp pose recovery
perception-to-execution mismatch
tactile sensing
object disambiguation
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Tactile Recovery
Decision-Aware Disambiguation
Perception-to-Execution Mismatch
Belief Space Planning
Grasp Pose Recovery
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
💼 Related Jobs
No related jobs found.
H
Haoran Wang
Institute of Advanced Intelligence and Computing (IAIC), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore; Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
Y
Yuteng Sun
Institute of Advanced Intelligence and Computing (IAIC), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore; Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
Yuanjie Li
Yuanjie Li
Associate Professor, Tsinghua University
Satellite networkwireless & mobile networknetwork securitymobile/edge computing
R
Ruofei Bai
Institute of Advanced Intelligence and Computing (IAIC), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore; Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
M
Meng Yee Chuah
Institute of Advanced Intelligence and Computing (IAIC), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore
W
Wenyu Liang
Institute of Advanced Intelligence and Computing (IAIC), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore
J
Jun Li
Institute of Advanced Intelligence and Computing (IAIC), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore
W
Wei-Yun Yau
Institute of Advanced Intelligence and Computing (IAIC), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore