🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the lack of empirical understanding regarding human-AI collaboration boundaries and trust reconstruction mechanisms during the transition of enterprise AI toward proactive, multi-user agents. Employing qualitative field research within a large technology company, we examine the deployment of persistent, proactive AI teammates and integrate organizational behavior analysis to identify early micro-negotiation signals. Our findings reveal implicit rule conflicts, blurred relational boundaries, and agency redistribution, elucidating the dynamic evolution of human-AI work boundaries. Furthermore, this work proposes a novel research and design agenda that deliberately preserves human agency within shared workspaces, offering both theoretical foundations and practical guidelines for constructing intelligent collaborative systems that respect human subjectivity.
📝 Abstract
Enterprise AI is transitioning from single-user, reactive tools toward proactive, multi-user 'teammates,' but our empirical understanding of this transition is limited. In this paper, we present an in-situ qualitative study of a persistent, proactive AI agent 'teammate' deployed across multiple teams in a large technology company. Our findings reveal the boundaries of the human-agent workplace are actively in flux, triggering breakdowns and negotiations across: 1) tacit rules of collaborative human workflows, 2) the relational boundaries of this new non-human actor, and 3) the redistribution of trust and human agency. We use these early micro-negotiations as signals to chart a new research, design, and organizational agenda that intentionally preserves human agency in a workplace shared with non-human organizational actors.