🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the limitations of existing Electronic Health Record (EHR) retrieval benchmarks, which rely on manual annotation and rapidly become outdated, thereby hindering effective evaluation of clinical large language models (LLMs). To overcome these challenges, this work proposes BRIE, a benchmarking framework that automatically generates question-answer pairs from longitudinal EHR notes. By integrating LLMs with expert validation mechanisms, BRIE enables automated benchmark generation, supports multiple reasoning variants per answer, and facilitates continuous dynamic refreshing to effectively prevent data leakage. Experimental evaluations reveal that mainstream models frequently overlook critical information when processing complex multi-document queries. These findings demonstrate that the proposed dynamic benchmark provides a more rigorous and reliable assessment of clinical LLM performance compared to conventional static approaches.
📝 Abstract
Large language model (LLM)-based clinical assistants are increasingly being integrated into electronic health record (EHR) systems, transforming how clinicians retrieve and synthesize information from patient records. Their safety and utility depend on rigorous evaluation, yet existing benchmarks are manually curated, costly to update, and rapidly become obsolete with evolving technological advancements. We present a scalable framework that automatically generates question--answer pairs from longitudinal EHR notes. Nineteen clinicians validate the benchmark generator, producing the Benchmark for Retrieving Information in EHRs (BRIE), a continuously maintainable evaluation dataset. Across nine LLMs and five inference strategies, state-of-the-art systems frequently omit clinically important information, particularly for questions requiring synthesis across multiple documents and encounters. Because the generator itself is validated, BRIE supports evaluations that static benchmarks cannot, including the generation of multiple answers that reflect variation in clinician reasoning for robust performance assessment and continuously refreshing benchmark content to guard against leakage. Our results demonstrate that scalable benchmark generation enables rigorous, up-to-date evaluation of clinical LLMs as they are deployed in rapidly evolving healthcare settings.