Closing the Responsibility Gap in AI-based Network Management: An Intelligent Audit System Approach

📅 2025-02-08
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
In AI-driven network management systems, accountability remains ambiguous due to the lack of clear responsibility attribution and formal accountability mechanisms. Method: This paper proposes the first responsibility quantification framework for AI-based network management agents. It integrates deep reinforcement learning (DRL) for agent provenance identification (96% accuracy) and machine learning—optimized via gradient descent—for network state attribution (83% accuracy). Crucially, it embeds explainability directly into the AI decision pipeline. Contribution/Results: The framework enables closed-loop responsibility determination under critical scenarios such as human-in-the-loop absence, algorithmic bias, and model miscalibration. Evaluated in a realistic simulation environment, it establishes an auditable, traceable, and quantifiable accountability infrastructure for AI-powered network management—marking a foundational step toward trustworthy autonomous network operations.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Existing network paradigms have achieved lower downtime as well as a higher Quality of Experience (QoE) through the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based network management tools. These AI management systems, allow for automatic responses to changes in network conditions, lowering operation costs for operators, and improving overall performance. While adopting AI-based management tools enhance the overall network performance, it also introduce challenges such as removing human supervision, privacy violations, algorithmic bias, and model inaccuracies. Furthermore, AI-based agents that fail to address these challenges should be culpable themselves rather than the network as a whole. To address this accountability gap, a framework consisting of a Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) model and a Machine Learning (ML) model is proposed to identify and assign numerical values of responsibility to the AI-based management agents involved in any decision-making regarding the network conditions, which eventually affects the end-user. A simulation environment was created for the framework to be trained using simulated network operation parameters. The DRL model had a 96% accuracy during testing for identifying the AI-based management agents, while the ML model using gradient descent learned the network conditions at an 83% accuracy during testing.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

AI-based network management accountability
Responsibility gap in AI systems
Deep Reinforcement Learning for audit
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Deep Reinforcement Learning model
Machine Learning model
Responsibility assignment framework
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.