From Weak to Strong Testing in Gaussian Models

πŸ“… 2026-09-28
πŸ“ˆ Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
πŸ“„ PDF
πŸ€– AI Summary
This study investigates the computational complexity of hypothesis testing in the Spiked Wigner model, focusing on the boundaries between weak and strong detection under polynomial-time constraints and their associated error trade-offs. Methodologically, by leveraging the low-degree likelihood ratio (LDLR) and linear spectral statistics, we establish a computational analogue of the Neyman–Pearson lemma, demonstrating that weak detection can be fully reduced to strong detection. The primary contributions include precisely characterizing the optimal trade-off between Type I and Type II errors, determining the polynomial-time weak detection limit, and revealing the intrinsic hardness of weak detection from a computational complexity perspective. Ultimately, this work provides a novel paradigm for detection theory in Gaussian models.
πŸ“ Abstract
We study the computational complexity of hypothesis testing in the spiked Wigner model, a prototypical model for detecting low-rank structure in a large random matrix. Below the "BBP" eigenvalue transition, it is expected that strong detection --- with both type I and II errors vanishing --- requires exponential time. Assuming this as a conjecture, we determine the limits of polynomial-time weak detection, exactly characterizing the possible tradeoffs between type I and II errors. Specifically, the optimal tradeoff is achieved by a particular linear spectral statistic. Thus, the question of weak detection is entirely reduced to that of strong detection. The proof builds on ideas of Nagda-Raghavendra (2025) and Moitra-Wein (2025). The low-degree likelihood ratio (LDLR) plays a key role: any test that slightly beats the LDLR can be boosted to have an even higher success probability. This leads us to establish a computational analogue of the Neyman-Pearson lemma for a subclass of additive Gaussian models: for a given super-polynomial runtime, the best possible tradeoff between type I and II errors is either the one achieved by thresholding the LDLR, or the trivial tradeoff that results from strong detection.
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Spiked Wigner Model
Low-Degree Likelihood Ratio
Computational Neyman-Pearson Lemma
Weak Detection
Linear Spectral Statistic