Distilling What Matters: Confidence-Aware Selective Distillation for Large Language Models

📅 2026-09-29
📈 Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the calibration degradation in student models during large language model knowledge distillation, which is caused by teacher hallucinations and high-entropy predictions. To mitigate this, we propose CaRE-KD, a framework that replaces static distillation objectives with confidence-gated, uncertainty-adaptive optimization. Its core innovation lies in a dual-granularity design: at the token level, it dynamically blends and adaptively switches between forward and reverse KL divergences; at the batch level, it introduces a Revival mechanism to suppress unreliable supervisory signals, integrated with gradient analysis and selective distillation techniques. Extensive evaluations across eleven benchmarks demonstrate that CaRE-KD significantly outperforms existing baselines, yielding a 3.2% improvement in ROUGE-L for instruction following and a 1.7% accuracy gain on GSM8K.
📝 Abstract
Knowledge Distillation (KD) trains a smaller-capacity student model to imitate a larger-capacity teacher model by matching output distributions, implicitly assuming the teacher to be a reliable oracle. In large language models (LLMs), this assumption often fails: teacher predictions can exhibit high entropy and hallucinations, causing standard KD to degrade well-calibrated student priors. We propose CaRE-KD, a confidence-gated distillation framework that replaces static objectives with uncertainty-adaptive optimization. CaRE-KD has two components: a token-level loss (CaRE-Divergence) that adaptively switches between Forward and Reverse KL divergence based on teacher--student confidence, and a batch-level epistemic rejection mechanism (Revival) that suppresses updates when the teacher is more uncertain than the student. We provide a gradient-level analysis showing how this dual-granularity design induces a conditional calibration mechanism that prior static divergences cannot reproduce. Empirically, across eight teacher--student pairs and eleven benchmarks spanning instruction following, chat alignment, code generation, and mathematical reasoning, CaRE-KD delivers consistent gains over strong baselines (Skewed-KL, $α$--$β$ divergence). Highlights include up to $+3.2$ average ROUGE-L on instruction-following tasks, $+2.1$ pass@1 on MBPP, $+1.7$ accuracy on GSM8k, and $+1.8$ accuracy on CollegeMath over the strongest baseline, with consistent gains in LLM-as-a-judge factuality (up to $+2.5$ per task over Skewed-RKL). Revival further acts as a principled, loss-agnostic plug-in that systematically strengthens existing distillation objectives by filtering epistemically unreliable teacher supervision.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Knowledge Distillation
Large Language Models
Hallucination
Calibration
Uncertainty
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Confidence-Aware Distillation
Adaptive KL Divergence
Epistemic Rejection
Knowledge Distillation
Large Language Models
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.