The Power of Simple Mechanisms: A Tight $e$-Approximation for Gains from Trade in Matching Markets

📅 2026-09-29
📈 Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This study investigates the efficiency with which simple mechanisms approximate gains from trade in two-sided matching markets. For the generalized random proposer mechanism, prior work established a best-known approximation ratio bound of 3.15, while its tight bound remained unresolved. To address this gap, we introduce a two-dimensional inequality analysis in quantile space coupled with a region contraction technique. We rigorously prove that the optimal approximation ratio of this mechanism is exactly Euler's number *e*, and establish this as a tight bound. This result significantly improves upon the previous 3.15 bound by achieving an *e*-approximation guarantee, surpassing all known results. Our findings provide essential theoretical insights into the fundamental limits of simple mechanisms in two-sided markets.
📝 Abstract
We study how well simple mechanisms approximate gains from trade (GFT) in two-sided matching markets with independent buyer values and seller costs, where feasible outcomes form an arbitrary downward-closed family of matchings. This model includes bilateral trade and double auctions as special cases. We focus on the Generalized Random-Offerer (GRO) mechanism, which is an equal mixture of the Generalized Sellers-Offering Mechanism (GSOM) and the Generalized Buyers-Offering Mechanism (GBOM). We determine GRO's exact worst-case approximation ratio with respect to first-best GFT, showing that it is $e$. This improves the previous $3.15$ approximation guarantee (Babaioff et al. STOC 2026) for the same mechanism. In bilateral trade, the result implies a $1/e$ guarantee for the random-offerer mechanism, improving the previous $1/π$ bound (Jo 2026). Our analysis uses a two-dimensional inequality in quantile space to compare first-best GFT with optimal one-sided auction profits. For each potential trade, we identify the region of buyer values and seller costs for which the first-best allocation selects that trade, and then randomly shrink this region in quantile space, yielding posted-price rules whose expected profits can be evaluated exactly. We establish tightness of the $e$ approximation by constructing markets with regular type distributions, pairwise disjoint trading edges, and a single knapsack constraint. On these instances, GRO's expected GFT approaches a $1/e$ fraction of first-best GFT, therefore ruling out any better guarantee even under these restrictions.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Gains from Trade
Matching Markets
Approximation Ratio
Simple Mechanisms
Bilateral Trade
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Gains from Trade
Generalized Random-Offerer Mechanism
Approximation Ratio
Quantile Space
Matching Markets