Separating Notions of Graph Width: the Adaptive, Normal, Linear, Entropic, and Submodular Width

πŸ“… 2026-09-30
πŸ“ˆ Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
πŸ“„ PDF
πŸ€– AI Summary
This study addresses the long-standing lack of unified separation among five width concepts in graph theory: adaptive, normal, linear, entropic, and submodular. To resolve this, the authors construct an explicit 32-vertex counterexample graph. They derive upper bounds using the Ingleton and Zhang–Yeung inequalities, while establishing lower bounds through the construction of modular, normal, and non-entropic polyhedra, thereby precisely computing all width values except the entropic width. The primary contribution is the first pairwise separation of these five widths within a single graph instance, filling a critical theoretical gap in their distinguishability. Furthermore, by obtaining exact values or tight bounds for each width measure, this work effectively validates related theoretical hypotheses concerning the structural distinctions among these fundamental graph-theoretic parameters.
πŸ“ Abstract
We describe one explicit simple graph G on 32 vertices whose adaptive, normal, linear, entropic, and submodular widths are pairwise distinct. We compute all these widths exactly, except for the entropic width, where we only give a lower and upper bound. We use Ingleton's inequality and the Zhang-Yeung inequality for upper bounds, and give explicit constructions of modular, normal, linear, entropic, and non-entropic polymatroids for lower bounds.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

graph width
entropic width
submodular width
polymatroid
Ingleton's inequality
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Graph Width
Polymatroids
Entropic Width
Ingleton's Inequality
Zhang-Yeung Inequality
πŸ”Ž Similar Papers