Surrogate models for Rock-Fluid Interaction: A Grid-Size-Invariant Approach

πŸ“… 2026-02-25
πŸ“ˆ Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
πŸ“„ PDF
πŸ€– AI Summary
This study addresses the high computational cost of high-fidelity numerical simulations of rock–fluid interactions, which hinders their application in multi-query tasks such as uncertainty quantification and optimization. To overcome this limitation, the authors develop eight deep learning surrogate models, including dual-neural-network-based reduced-order models and single-network image-to-image architectures with grid-size invariance. A novel grid-size invariance framework is introduced, enabling the models to generalize to computational grids larger than those used during training. Notably, this work presents the first application of UNet++ in this domain. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed approaches significantly reduce training memory consumption while maintaining high prediction accuracy under non-stationary solid-field conditions, outperforming both conventional reduced-order models and standard UNet baselines.

Technology Category

Application Category

πŸ“ Abstract
Modelling rock-fluid interaction requires solving a set of partial differential equations (PDEs) to predict the flow behaviour and the reactions of the fluid with the rock on the interfaces. Conventional high-fidelity numerical models require a high resolution to obtain reliable results, resulting in huge computational expense. This restricts the applicability of these models for multi-query problems, such as uncertainty quantification and optimisation, which require running numerous scenarios. As a cheaper alternative to high-fidelity models, this work develops eight surrogate models for predicting the fluid flow in porous media. Four of these are reduced-order models (ROM) based on one neural network for compression and another for prediction. The other four are single neural networks with the property of grid-size invariance; a term which we use to refer to image-to-image models that are capable of inferring on computational domains that are larger than those used during training. In addition to the novel grid-size-invariant framework for surrogate models, we compare the predictive performance of UNet and UNet++ architectures, and demonstrate that UNet++ outperforms UNet for surrogate models. Furthermore, we show that the grid-size-invariant approach is a reliable way to reduce memory consumption during training, resulting in good correlation between predicted and ground-truth values and outperforming the ROMs analysed. The application analysed is particularly challenging because fluid-induced rock dissolution results in a non-static solid field and, consequently, it cannot be used to help in adjustments of the future prediction.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

rock-fluid interaction
surrogate models
computational expense
multi-query problems
porous media
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

grid-size-invariant
surrogate modeling
rock-fluid interaction
UNet++
reduced-order models
πŸ”Ž Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
N
Nathalie C. Pinheiro
Applied Modelling and Computation Group, Department of Earth Science and Engineering, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ UK
D
Donghu Guo
Applied Modelling and Computation Group, Department of Earth Science and Engineering, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ UK
Hannah P. Menke
Hannah P. Menke
Associate Professor, Institute of GeoEnergy Engineering, Heriot-Watt University
GeoEnergyFlow in Porous MediaReactive TransportMultiscale ImagingAI & Machine Learning
A
Aniket C. Joshi
Applied Modelling and Computation Group, Department of Earth Science and Engineering, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ UK; Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ UK
C
Claire E. Heaney
Applied Modelling and Computation Group, Department of Earth Science and Engineering, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ UK; Centre for AI-Physics Modelling, Imperial-X, White City Campus, Imperial College London, London, W12 7SL UK
A
Ahmed H. ElSheikh
Institute of GeoEnergy Engineering, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, EH14 1AS UK
C
Christopher C. Pain
Applied Modelling and Computation Group, Department of Earth Science and Engineering, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ UK; Centre for AI-Physics Modelling, Imperial-X, White City Campus, Imperial College London, London, W12 7SL UK; Data Assimilation Lab., Data Science Institute, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ UK