🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the challenge that conventional static testing fails to account for device-to-device variability and the dynamic interplay among multiple degradation mechanisms—such as bias temperature instability (BTI), electromigration (EM), and time-dependent dielectric breakdown (TDDB)—in semiconductor reliability assessment. To overcome this limitation, the work formulates reliability qualification as a partially observable sequential decision-making problem and introduces an adaptive testing framework that integrates Monte Carlo tree search with simulated annealing (MCTS-SA) and an extended Kalman filter (EKF). This approach enables closed-loop optimization of stress conditions through real-time belief-state estimation, dynamically balancing accurate degradation characterization against the risk of catastrophic failure while maintaining required safety margins. Experimental results demonstrate that after 5,000 iterations, the characterization success rate improves from 20% to 54%, yielding a cumulative gain of 39%; at termination of the optimal test sequence, the EM and TDDB damage fractions reach 0.564 and 0.537, respectively.
📝 Abstract
Reliability qualification of advanced semiconductor devices requires sequential stress decisions that balance characterization objectives against multiple competing failure mechanisms. Current practice relies on static test plans derived from population-level acceleration models, which cannot adapt to per-unit variability or real-time degradation observations. This paper presents a closed-loop adaptive test planning framework that formulates reliability qualification as a partially observable sequential decision problem and solves it using Monte Carlo tree search for seed-action simulators (MCTS-SA) coupled with extended Kalman filter (EKF) belief-state estimation. The framework models stochastic, per-device variability in bias temperature instability (BTI), electromigration (EM), and time-dependent dielectric breakdown (TDDB), and treats stress selection as a constrained sequential optimization, i.e., to maximize the probability of successful degradation characterization while respecting catastrophic failure constraints. Under the experimental assumptions used here (discrete stress actions, proxy damage observability, and cumulative degradation without recovery), we believe this to be a novel application of tree-search-based adaptive test planning to multi-mechanism reliability qualification. Across 5,000 planning iterations, the characterization yield (CY) improves from 20% in the first 500 iterations to over 54% in the final 500, with 39% cumulative success, while the best successful test sequence terminates with EM and TDDB damage fractions DEM=0.564 and DTDDB=0.537, well within safety margins. These results demonstrate that sequential Bayesian planning can synthesize damage-aware test policies that significantly outperform non-adaptive strategies for reliability qualification under competing failure modes.