๐ค AI Summary
This work addresses the critical barrier to reproducibility and integration with AI-for-Science (AI4S) agent workflows posed by the complex compilation and configuration of scientific software. We propose an end-to-end agent workflow that leverages a domain-specific taxonomy to filter repositories, automatically infers build specifications, containerizes the resulting artifacts, and validates their executability. For the first time, this pipeline enables the automated deployment of over 50,000 scientific tools within a single day. We successfully constructed reproducible execution environments for 50,112 tools, each verified by a minimal executable command, and released them in SciencePediaโthe first trustworthy capability repository grounded in actual execution rather than documentation. Additionally, we publicly share the large-scale deployment traces to illuminate operational bottlenecks in scientific software packaging.
๐ Abstract
Open-source scientific software is abundant, yet most tools remain difficult to compile, configure, and reuse, sustaining a small-workshop mode of scientific computing. This deployment bottleneck limits reproducibility, large-scale evaluation, and the practical integration of scientific tools into modern AI-for-Science (AI4S) and agentic workflows. We present Deploy-Master, a one-stop agentic workflow for large-scale tool discovery, build specification inference, execution-based validation, and publication. Guided by a taxonomy spanning 90+ scientific and engineering domains, our discovery stage starts from a recall-oriented pool of over 500,000 public repositories and progressively filters it to 52,550 executable tool candidates under license- and quality-aware criteria. Deploy-Master transforms heterogeneous open-source repositories into runnable, containerized capabilities grounded in execution rather than documentation claims. In a single day, we performed 52,550 build attempts and constructed reproducible runtime environments for 50,112 scientific tools. Each successful tool is validated by a minimal executable command and registered in SciencePedia for search and reuse, enabling direct human use and optional agent-based invocation. Beyond delivering runnable tools, we report a deployment trace at the scale of 50,000 tools, characterizing throughput, cost profiles, failure surfaces, and specification uncertainty that become visible only at scale. These results explain why scientific software remains difficult to operationalize and motivate shared, observable execution substrates as a foundation for scalable AI4S and agentic science.