🤖 AI Summary
This study investigates the effective adaptation of Scrum methodology to support student-led, long-term software projects under academic constraints and hybrid work conditions. Through a year-long case study tracking an eight-member team developing a virtual reality educational campus game, the research introduces lightweight coordination mechanisms, one-week sprints, and flexible ceremonies aligned with academic calendars, exam pressures, and remote collaboration needs. A toolchain integrating Discord, Notion, and GitHub, complemented by contribution metrics and a custom Communication Effectiveness Index (0.76/1.00), enables multidimensional team performance assessment. Findings demonstrate that lightweight coordination sustains consistent remote progress, while adaptable Scrum practices effectively balance academic workloads. The study further highlights the critical influence of non-process factors—such as motivation, role clarity, and work-style compatibility—on team success, offering a reusable framework and empirical guidance for agile practices in educational settings.
📝 Abstract
Agile methods, and Scrum in particular, are widely taught in software engineering education; however, there is limited empirical evidence on how these practices function in long-running, student-led projects under academic and hybrid work constraints. This paper presents a year-long case study of an eight-person student development team tasked with designing and implementing a virtual reality game that simulates a university campus and provides program-related educational content. We analyze how the team adapted Scrum practices (sprint structure, roles, backlog management) to fit semester rhythms, exams, travel, and part-time availability, and how communication and coordination were maintained in a hybrid on-site/remote environment. Using qualitative observations and artifacts from Discord, Notion, and GitHub, as well as contribution metrics and a custom communication effectiveness index (score: 0.76/1.00), we evaluate three dimensions: (1) the effectiveness of collaboration tools, (2) the impact of hybrid work on communication and productivity, and (3) the feasibility of aligning Scrum with academic timelines. Our findings show that (i) lightweight, tool-mediated coordination enabled stable progress even during remote periods; (ii) one-week sprints and flexible ceremonies helped reconcile Scrum with academic obligations; and (iii) shared motivation, role clarity, and compatible working styles were as critical as process mechanics. We propose practical recommendations for instructors and student teams adopting agile methods in hybrid, project-based learning settings.