SARA: Scene-Aware Reconstruction Accelerator

๐Ÿ“… 2026-01-11
๐Ÿ›๏ธ arXiv.org
๐Ÿ“ˆ Citations: 0
โœจ Influential: 0
๐Ÿ“„ PDF
๐Ÿค– AI Summary
This work proposes a geometry-driven image pair selection mechanism to overcome the high computational cost and limited reconstruction accuracy of traditional Structure-from-Motion (SfM) methods, which rely on visual similarity for pairing. Prior to feature matching, the approach evaluates the informativeness of candidate pairs using overlap and disparity metrics, constructs an information-weighted spanning tree, and incorporates a key-edge enhancement strategy. This method introduces the first โ€œgeometry-firstโ€ pairing paradigm, substantially reducing matching complexity. Experiments demonstrate that, across multiple learning-based feature detectors, it achieves a 46.5% reduction in average rotation error, a 12.5% decrease in translation error, and a 98% reduction in the number of matched pairs, while accelerating the pipeline by up to 50ร—โ€”all with reconstruction metric deviations maintained within ยฑ3%.

Technology Category

Application Category

๐Ÿ“ Abstract
We present SARA (Scene-Aware Reconstruction Accelerator), a geometry-driven pair selection module for Structure-from-Motion (SfM). Unlike conventional pipelines that select pairs based on visual similarity alone, SARA introduces geometry-first pair selection by scoring reconstruction informativeness - the product of overlap and parallax - before expensive matching. A lightweight pre-matching stage uses mutual nearest neighbors and RANSAC to estimate these cues, then constructs an Information-Weighted Spanning Tree (IWST) augmented with targeted edges for loop closure, long-baseline anchors, and weak-view reinforcement. Compared to exhaustive matching, SARA reduces rotation errors by 46.5+-5.5% and translation errors by 12.5+-6.5% across modern learned detectors, while achieving at most 50x speedup through 98% pair reduction (from 30,848 to 580 pairs). This reduces matching complexity from quadratic to quasi-linear, maintaining within +-3% of baseline reconstruction metrics for 3D Gaussian Splatting and SVRaster.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Structure-from-Motion
pair selection
reconstruction efficiency
geometry-aware matching
computational complexity
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

geometry-driven pair selection
Information-Weighted Spanning Tree
reconstruction informativeness
Structure-from-Motion acceleration
quasi-linear matching complexity
๐Ÿ”Ž Similar Papers
No similar papers found.