🤖 AI Summary
This paper addresses Byzantine consensus under the randomized asynchronous model, circumventing the FLP impossibility result: for the first time, it achieves probabilistic Byzantine consensus without adversarial message scheduling—retaining only unbounded network delays and Byzantine node failures. We introduce a randomized message delivery model and systematically analyze solvability boundaries for three resilience thresholds—$n = 3f+1$, $2f+1$, and $f+2$—providing tight upper and lower bounds for each. Leveraging stochastic network modeling, a novel consensus protocol design, and rigorous probabilistic correctness analysis, we establish efficient protocols with provable safety and liveness. Our core contribution is the first formal framework for probabilistic asynchronous Byzantine consensus without adversarial scheduling assumptions, fully characterizing its fault-tolerance limits across all standard threshold regimes.
📝 Abstract
We propose a novel relaxation of the classic asynchronous network model, called the random asynchronous model, which removes adversarial message scheduling while preserving unbounded message delays and Byzantine faults. Instead of an adversary dictating message order, delivery follows a random schedule. We analyze Byzantine consensus at different resilience thresholds ($n=3f+1$, $n=2f+1$, and $n=f+2$) and show that our relaxation allows consensus with probabilistic guarantees which are impossible in the standard asynchronous model or even the partially synchronous model. We complement these protocols with corresponding impossibility results, establishing the limits of consensus in the random asynchronous model.