MQG4AI Towards Responsible High-risk AI - Illustrated for Transparency Focusing on Explainability Techniques

📅 2025-02-17
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF

career value

200K/year
🤖 AI Summary
To address insufficient transparency during model explanation and the challenge of sustaining ethical and regulatory compliance in high-risk AI systems, this paper proposes MQG4AI—a quality management system tailored to the AI lifecycle. Centered on configurable Quality Gates, MQG4AI dynamically integrates technical implementation, ethical principles, and regulatory requirements, and innovatively embeds an Explanation Quality Assessment Guideline into lifecycle planning. It achieves structured assurance of explainability and transparency through AI lifecycle modeling, cross-phase information linkage mechanisms, and integration of a Responsible AI Knowledge Graph. The core contribution is the first responsible Quality Gate framework explicitly designed to accommodate AI’s evolutionary nature—providing developers of high-risk AI systems with an actionable, verifiable, and sustainably aligned compliance methodology.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
As artificial intelligence (AI) systems become increasingly integrated into critical domains, ensuring their responsible design and continuous development is imperative. Effective AI quality management (QM) requires tools and methodologies that address the complexities of the AI lifecycle. In this paper, we propose an approach for AI lifecycle planning that bridges the gap between generic guidelines and use case-specific requirements (MQG4AI). Our work aims to contribute to the development of practical tools for implementing Responsible AI (RAI) by aligning lifecycle planning with technical, ethical and regulatory demands. Central to our approach is the introduction of a flexible and customizable Methodology based on Quality Gates, whose building blocks incorporate RAI knowledge through information linking along the AI lifecycle in a continuous manner, addressing AIs evolutionary character. For our present contribution, we put a particular emphasis on the Explanation stage during model development, and illustrate how to align a guideline to evaluate the quality of explanations with MQG4AI, contributing to overall Transparency.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Responsible AI lifecycle planning
Quality Gates methodology
Transparency in explainability techniques
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Quality Gates Methodology
AI lifecycle planning
Explanation stage alignment
M
Miriam Elia
Faculty of Applied Computer Science, University of Augsburg, Universitätsstraße 6a, Augsburg, 86159, Bavaria, Germany
A
Alba Maria Lopez
Artificial Intelligence Department, ETSI Informaticos, Universidad Politécnica, C. de los Ciruelos, 28660 Madrid, Spain
K
Katherin Alexandra Corredor
Artificial Intelligence Department, ETSI Informaticos, Universidad Politécnica, C. de los Ciruelos, 28660 Madrid, Spain
Bernhard Bauer
Bernhard Bauer
University of Augsburg
Model-driven EngineeringAnalysis of SystemsSynthesis of SystemsEvolution of SystemsMethod Engineering and Development Processes
E
Esteban Garcia-Cuesta
Artificial Intelligence Department, ETSI Informaticos, Universidad Politécnica, C. de los Ciruelos, 28660 Madrid, Spain