AIMER: Calibration-Free Task-Agnostic MoE Pruning

๐Ÿ“… 2026-03-19
๐Ÿ“ˆ Citations: 0
โœจ Influential: 0
๐Ÿ“„ PDF

career value

190K/year
๐Ÿค– AI Summary
This work addresses the limitations of existing task-agnostic expert pruning methods for Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models, which rely on calibration sets to estimate expert importanceโ€”leading to sensitivity in results and substantial preprocessing overhead. To overcome this, the authors propose a calibration-free scoring criterion that ranks experts within each layer based on the ratio of absolute mean to root mean square (RMS). This enables efficient and stable intra-layer expert differentiation and hierarchical pruning. The method scales effectively across MoE models ranging from 7B to 30B parameters, with scoring times as low as 0.22โ€“1.27 seconds. Evaluated on 16 benchmarks, it achieves competitive or superior performance compared to calibration-dependent approaches at pruning rates of 25%โ€“50%, significantly enhancing both pruning efficiency and generalization capability.

Technology Category

Application Category

๐Ÿ“ Abstract
Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) language models increase parameter capacity without proportional per-token compute, but the deployment still requires storing all experts, making expert pruning important for reducing memory and serving overhead. Existing task-agnostic expert pruning methods are typically calibration-dependent: they estimate expert importance from routing or activation statistics on a calibration set, which makes pruning outcomes sensitive to the choice of calibration set and adds substantial preprocessing cost. We introduce AIMER (\textbf{A}bsolute mean over root mean square \textbf{IM}portance for \textbf{E}xpert \textbf{R}anking), a simple calibration-free criterion that yields clear within-layer score separation and distinct expert stratification. Across 7B to 30B MoE language models at 25\% and 50\% pruning ratios over 16 benchmarks, AIMER consistently delivers competitive or stronger overall performance against state-of-the-art calibration-based expert pruning baselines with only 0.22--1.27 seconds for scoring the experts.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Mixture-of-Experts
expert pruning
calibration-free
task-agnostic
model compression
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

calibration-free
Mixture-of-Experts
expert pruning
task-agnostic
efficient inference