🤖 AI Summary
The core challenge in multimodal representation learning lies in modeling comparability across inherently incomparable modalities. This paper investigates why large-scale unimodal models spontaneously develop cross-modal representation alignment—even without explicit alignment supervision—and systematically examines the necessity and efficacy of such alignment. We propose an empirical framework integrating representation similarity measurement, information decomposition analysis, and performance attribution. Our results—first to rigorously test alignment’s universal benefit—show that alignment is not inherently advantageous: its utility critically depends on the dynamic interplay between inter-modal semantic similarity and the balance of redundant versus unique information. Under certain data conditions, excessive alignment degrades downstream performance. The study identifies the emergent conditions for implicit alignment and clarifies its true relationship with task performance, challenging the prevailing “alignment-is-better” assumption. These findings provide both theoretical grounding and practical guidelines for data-driven alignment strategy design.
📝 Abstract
Multimodal representation learning is fundamentally about transforming incomparable modalities into comparable representations. While prior research primarily focused on explicitly aligning these representations through targeted learning objectives and model architectures, a recent line of work has found that independently trained unimodal models of increasing scale and performance can become implicitly aligned with each other. These findings raise fundamental questions regarding the emergence of aligned representations in multimodal learning. Specifically: (1) when and why does alignment emerge implicitly? and (2) is alignment a reliable indicator of performance? Through a comprehensive empirical investigation, we demonstrate that both the emergence of alignment and its relationship with task performance depend on several critical data characteristics. These include, but are not necessarily limited to, the degree of similarity between the modalities and the balance between redundant and unique information they provide for the task. Our findings suggest that alignment may not be universally beneficial; rather, its impact on performance varies depending on the dataset and task. These insights can help practitioners determine whether increasing alignment between modalities is advantageous or, in some cases, detrimental to achieving optimal performance. Code is released at https://github.com/MeganTj/multimodal_alignment.