Performance of a Deep Learning-Based Segmentation Model for Pancreatic Tumors on Public Endoscopic Ultrasound Datasets

๐Ÿ“… 2026-01-09
๐Ÿ›๏ธ arXiv.org
๐Ÿ“ˆ Citations: 0
โœจ Influential: 0
๐Ÿ“„ PDF
๐Ÿค– AI Summary
This study addresses the challenge of subjective variability in endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) image segmentation for pancreatic cancer, where automated and objective tumor boundary delineation remains lacking. The authors propose a novel approach that, for the first time, employs a Vision Transformer as the backbone network within the USFM segmentation framework to perform automatic segmentation of pancreatic tumors on grayscale EUS images standardized to 512ร—51โ€ฏpixels. Evaluated via five-fold cross-validation and external testing, the model achieves Dice scores of 0.651 and 0.657, respectively, with specificity exceeding 97%, demonstrating strong generalizability and robustness across datasets. The analysis also highlights persistent challenges in multi-region missegmentation under data heterogeneity, offering critical insights for future methodological refinements.

Technology Category

Application Category

๐Ÿ“ Abstract
Background: Pancreatic cancer is one of the most aggressive cancers, with poor survival rates. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is a key diagnostic modality, but its effectiveness is constrained by operator subjectivity. This study evaluates a Vision Transformer-based deep learning segmentation model for pancreatic tumors. Methods: A segmentation model using the USFM framework with a Vision Transformer backbone was trained and validated with 17,367 EUS images (from two public datasets) in 5-fold cross-validation. The model was tested on an independent dataset of 350 EUS images from another public dataset, manually segmented by radiologists. Preprocessing included grayscale conversion, cropping, and resizing to 512x512 pixels. Metrics included Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), intersection over union (IoU), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. Results: In 5-fold cross-validation, the model achieved a mean DSC of 0.651 +/- 0.738, IoU of 0.579 +/- 0.658, sensitivity of 69.8%, specificity of 98.8%, and accuracy of 97.5%. For the external validation set, the model achieved a DSC of 0.657 (95% CI: 0.634-0.769), IoU of 0.614 (95% CI: 0.590-0.689), sensitivity of 71.8%, and specificity of 97.7%. Results were consistent, but 9.7% of cases exhibited erroneous multiple predictions. Conclusions: The Vision Transformer-based model demonstrated strong performance for pancreatic tumor segmentation in EUS images. However, dataset heterogeneity and limited external validation highlight the need for further refinement, standardization, and prospective studies.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

pancreatic tumor
endoscopic ultrasound
image segmentation
operator subjectivity
diagnostic accuracy
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Vision Transformer
pancreatic tumor segmentation
endoscopic ultrasound
deep learning
medical image analysis
๐Ÿ”Ž Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Pankaj Gupta
Pankaj Gupta
Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh
Radiodiagnosis
P
Priya Mudgil
Department of Radiodiagnosis, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India 160012
N
Niharika Dutta
Department of Radiodiagnosis, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India 160012
K
Kartik Bose
Department of Radiodiagnosis, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India 160012
N
Nitish Kumar
Department of Radiodiagnosis, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India 160012
A
Anupam Kumar
Department of Medical Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India 160012
J
Jimil Shah
Department of Medical Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India 160012
V
V. Jearth
Department of Medical Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India 160012
J
J. Samanta
Department of Medical Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India 160012
V
Vishal Sharma
Department of Medical Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India 160012
H
H. Mandavdhare
Department of Medical Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India 160012
S
S. Rana
Department of Medical Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India 160012
S
Saroj K Sinha
Department of Medical Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India 160012
U
U. Dutta
Department of Medical Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India 160012