A comprehensive comparison of neural operators for 3D industry-scale engineering designs

📅 2025-10-07
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Neural operators for 3D industrial engineering design lack fair, systematic evaluation. Method: We construct and open-source six standardized 3D engineering benchmark datasets covering thermodynamics, elasticity, plasticity, and fluid dynamics; uniformly evaluate four representative architectures—DeepONet (branch-trunk), graph neural networks, Fourier neural operators, and PointNet—across accuracy, inference latency, memory footprint, and deployment complexity; and propose an engineering-oriented preprocessing standardization pipeline and practical model adaptation strategies. Contribution/Results: This work establishes the first reproducible, comparable, and deployable comprehensive evaluation framework for neural operators on industrial-scale 3D physical problems. It enables rigorous, cross-model and cross-task benchmarking, providing empirical evidence and practical guidelines for engineering AI model selection and architecture design.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Neural operators have emerged as powerful tools for learning nonlinear mappings between function spaces, enabling real-time prediction of complex dynamics in diverse scientific and engineering applications. With their growing adoption in engineering design evaluation, a wide range of neural operator architectures have been proposed for various problem settings. However, model selection remains challenging due to the absence of fair and comprehensive comparisons. To address this, we propose and standardize six representative 3D industry-scale engineering design datasets spanning thermal analysis, linear elasticity, elasto-plasticity, time-dependent plastic problems, and computational fluid dynamics. All datasets include fully preprocessed inputs and outputs for model training, making them directly usable across diverse neural operator architectures. Using these datasets, we conduct a systematic comparison of four types of neural operator variants, including Branch-Trunk-based Neural Operators inspired by DeepONet, Graph-based Neural Operators inspired by Graph Neural Networks, Grid-based Neural Operators inspired by Fourier Neural Operators, and Point-based Neural Operators inspired by PointNet. We further introduce practical enhancements to adapt these models to different engineering settings, improving the fairness of the comparison. Our benchmarking study evaluates each model strengths and limitations in terms of predictive performance, computational efficiency, memory usage, and deployment complexity. The findings provide actionable insights to guide future neural operator development.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Standardizing neural operator comparisons for 3D engineering designs
Evaluating model performance across six industrial-scale physical problems
Benchmarking computational efficiency and deployment complexity of operators
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Standardized six 3D industry-scale engineering datasets
Systematically compared four neural operator architectures
Introduced practical enhancements for fair comparison
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
W
Weiheng Zhong
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801
Q
Qibang Liu
National Center for Supercomputing Applications, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801
D
Diab Abueidda
National Center for Supercomputing Applications, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801
Seid Koric
Seid Koric
Research Professor and Technical Director of NCSA
Scientific Machine LearningAdvanced ManufacturingMaterials ProcessingBio-Mechanics
H
Hadi Meidani
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801