Generative Artificial Intelligence for Academic Research: Evidence from Guidance Issued for Researchers by Higher Education Institutions in the United States

📅 2025-03-01
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
The widespread adoption of generative AI in academic research has intensified ethical governance challenges—including authorship attribution, data bias, transparency, and privacy—while university policies lag behind technological practice. Method: This study constructs the first nationwide database of AI research guidelines from 127 U.S. universities and proposes a three-dimensional analytical framework (“applicable scenarios–responsible actors–risk levels”). It integrates computational content analysis, LDA topic modeling, and expert-validated coding to identify governance paradigms. Contribution/Results: Two dominant paradigms emerge: “tool neutrality” and “process embedding.” Critically, only 38% of guidelines explicitly define authorship norms for AI-assisted writing and data analysis, exposing significant policy gaps and implementation ambiguity. The study delivers a reproducible methodological toolkit and empirically grounded benchmarks to advance ethical AI governance in higher education.

Technology Category

Application Category

Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Balancing GenAI productivity with ethical concerns in research.
Understanding and addressing GenAI's impact on authorship and privacy.
Ensuring compliance and responsibility in GenAI use among researchers.
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Refer to external sources for updates and training
Understand GenAI attributes and ethical concerns
Acknowledge and disclose GenAI use effectively
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.