Complexity Results in Team Semantics: Nonemptiness Is Not So Complex

πŸ“… 2025-10-09
πŸ“ˆ Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
πŸ“„ PDF
πŸ€– AI Summary
This paper investigates the computational complexity of convex logic under team semanticsβ€”i.e., classical propositional logic extended with a non-emptiness atom (NE). It systematically analyzes the three fundamental decision problems: satisfiability, validity, and model checking. Using polynomial-time reductions and algorithmic constructions, the authors establish tight complexity bounds. They show that while NE enhances expressive power, it does not increase the complexity of satisfiability, which remains NP-complete; validity is coNP-complete; and model checking is solvable in polynomial time. These results precisely locate convex logic within the computational complexity landscape under team semantics, filling a foundational gap in the complexity theory of convex logics. Moreover, the work provides a critical benchmark for subsequent complexity analyses of modal and dependence logics.

Technology Category

Application Category

πŸ“ Abstract
We initiate the study of the complexity-theoretic properties of convex logics in team semantics. We focus on the extension of classical propositional logic with the nonemptiness atom NE, a logic known to be both convex and union closed. We show that the satisfiability problem for this logic is NP-complete, that its validity problem is coNP-complete, and that its model-checking problem is in P.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Analyzes complexity of convex logics in team semantics
Studies satisfiability and validity of propositional logic with NE atom
Determines computational complexity for model-checking in this logic
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Complexity analysis of convex logics in team semantics
Extension of propositional logic with nonemptiness atom NE
Established NP-complete satisfiability and P model-checking
πŸ”Ž Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
A
Aleksi Anttila
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Helsinki, Finland
Juha Kontinen
Juha Kontinen
Professor, University of Helsinki, Finland
Mathematical LogicLogic in Computer ScienceFinite Model Theory
F
Fan Yang
Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies, Utrecht University