π€ AI Summary
This paper investigates the computational complexity of convex logic under team semanticsβi.e., classical propositional logic extended with a non-emptiness atom (NE). It systematically analyzes the three fundamental decision problems: satisfiability, validity, and model checking. Using polynomial-time reductions and algorithmic constructions, the authors establish tight complexity bounds. They show that while NE enhances expressive power, it does not increase the complexity of satisfiability, which remains NP-complete; validity is coNP-complete; and model checking is solvable in polynomial time. These results precisely locate convex logic within the computational complexity landscape under team semantics, filling a foundational gap in the complexity theory of convex logics. Moreover, the work provides a critical benchmark for subsequent complexity analyses of modal and dependence logics.
π Abstract
We initiate the study of the complexity-theoretic properties of convex logics in team semantics. We focus on the extension of classical propositional logic with the nonemptiness atom NE, a logic known to be both convex and union closed. We show that the satisfiability problem for this logic is NP-complete, that its validity problem is coNP-complete, and that its model-checking problem is in P.