GM3: A General Physical Model for Micro-Mobility Vehicles

📅 2025-10-09
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Existing micro-mobility vehicle (MMV) dynamics models rely on simplified kinematics or configuration-specific physics, neglecting critical nonlinear effects—including tire slip, load transfer, and rider-vehicle lean—thus lacking unified modeling capability across diverse wheeled configurations. Method: We propose GM3, a general-purpose physics-based model integrating the brush tire model and rigid-body dynamics to explicitly capture tire–ground contact forces, vertical load redistribution, and coupled rider–vehicle lean. A decoupled simulation framework enables arbitrary wheel layouts and model-agnostic dynamic comparison. Using fixed-step RK4 integration, GM3 incorporates human–machine interaction and script-based control for high-fidelity real-time trajectory simulation and logging. Results: Evaluated on the “deathCircle” scenario from the Stanford Drone Dataset, GM3 achieves centimeter-level trajectory fidelity and accurate dynamic reconstruction for cyclists, scooters, and push-carts, demonstrating strong generalizability and precision across heterogeneous MMV classes.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Modeling the dynamics of micro-mobility vehicles (MMV) is becoming increasingly important for training autonomous vehicle systems and building urban traffic simulations. However, mainstream tools rely on variants of the Kinematic Bicycle Model (KBM) or mode-specific physics that miss tire slip, load transfer, and rider/vehicle lean. To our knowledge, no unified, physics-based model captures these dynamics across the full range of common MMVs and wheel layouts. We propose the "Generalized Micro-mobility Model" (GM3), a tire-level formulation based on the tire brush representation that supports arbitrary wheel configurations, including single/double track and multi-wheel platforms. We introduce an interactive model-agnostic simulation framework that decouples vehicle/layout specification from dynamics to compare the GM3 with the KBM and other models, consisting of fixed step RK4 integration, human-in-the-loop and scripted control, real-time trajectory traces and logging for analysis. We also empirically validate the GM3 on the Stanford Drone Dataset's deathCircle (roundabout) scene for biker, skater, and cart classes.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Modeling micro-mobility vehicle dynamics for autonomous systems
Capturing tire slip and rider lean in unified physics
Supporting arbitrary wheel configurations across MMV types
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Tire brush model for arbitrary wheel configurations
Model-agnostic simulation with RK4 integration
Empirical validation using drone dataset trajectories
G
Grace Cai
Department of Computer Science, University of Maryland at College Park, MD, U.S.A.
Nithin Parepally
Nithin Parepally
University of Maryland
Artificial IntelligenceComputational GeometryCrowd SimulationComputer Vision
L
Laura Zheng
Department of Computer Science, University of Maryland at College Park, MD, U.S.A.
M
Ming C. Lin
Department of Computer Science, University of Maryland at College Park, MD, U.S.A.