🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the challenge of detecting intraday options market manipulation, whose signals are transient and obscured by normal market fluctuations, often forcing a trade-off between recall and precision in existing methods. The authors propose a minute-level detection framework based on market state velocities—such as option Delta velocity and underlying price velocity—leveraging dynamic velocity patterns rather than static levels to capture manipulative behavior for the first time. By integrating a hidden Markov model to identify latent market regimes and employing SHAP for interpretable attribution, the method achieves high fidelity across markets. Evaluated under strict temporal partitioning, it correctly identifies all 10 regulator-confirmed manipulation days in Indian BANKNIFTY options and attains AUCs of 0.91 (ARQQ) and 0.81 (ACY) for “pump-and-dump” velocity signatures in U.S. equity cases, with peak alerts precisely aligned to regulatory findings, demonstrating strong cross-market transferability and consistency.
📝 Abstract
Intraday market manipulation is hard to detect because its footprint is brief, buried in millions of quotes, and statistically similar to ordinary volatility. Detectors reach high recall only by flagging so many other days that measured precision collapses, producing alerts no regulator can act on. We show that this manipulation leaves a distinctive dynamic signature: a pump-and-crash pattern visible in the velocity of market state, rather than its level.
We build a minute-level detection pipeline, strictly partitioned in time, based on smoothed state velocity: option-Delta velocity for index options and price velocity for equities. We explain every alert with SHAP attribution. We hold the test period strictly out-of-sample and fix all thresholds before evaluation. On the locked Indian BANKNIFTY index-options test, the plain autoencoder recovers 10 of 10 regulator-identified manipulation days.
Conditioning detection on market regimes inferred by a hidden Markov model yields an instructive negative result. The regimes are descriptively distinct, but using them trades recall for precision. Under the closed-world assumption that unlabeled days are normal, precision remains near 25%.
The same dynamic appears in thinly traded U.S. equities (SEC v. Patel). The shape of the signature survives the transfer; its velocity magnitude does not. A pump-reversal shape score ranks the complaint's alleged manipulation days with AUC 0.91 (ARQQ) and 0.81 (ACY). On the ARQQ worked example, the score peaks inside the complaint's documented minute window.
Finally, exact SHAP attribution over every alert shows that unconfirmed alerts share the regulator-identified days' attribution profile (cosine similarity 0.99). The precision ceiling is consistent with incomplete enforcement labels rather than detector failure. What transfers across markets and instrument types is the dynamic signature itself.