VideoArgus: Agentic Rubric-Grounded Unified Evaluation for Video Generation and Editing

πŸ“… 2026-08-05
πŸ“ˆ Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
πŸ“„ PDF
πŸ€– AI Summary
Existing evaluation methods for video generation and editing are constrained by fixed content, limited scene coverage, and a lack of interpretable scoring rationales. This work proposes VideoArgus, the first unified, reusable, and evidence-driven automatic evaluation framework encompassing five video-related tasks. For each input sample, VideoArgus automatically generates fine-grained, output-agnostic scoring criteria and leverages visual-language model–based question answering, visual analysis tools, and relevance verification to produce scores, justifications, and diagnostic reports grounded in explicit evidence. Evaluated on a human-aligned test set of 1,260 videos, VideoArgus achieves higher Spearman and Kendall correlation coefficients than task-specific evaluators, with stable ranking performance across different backbone models.
πŸ“ Abstract
Evaluating generated videos remains challenging because existing benchmarks rely on fixed evaluation content, cover only a subset of generation and editing settings, and provide limited evidence for their scores. We introduce VideoArgus, a unified rubric-grounded framework covering five video generation and editing settings. For each input instance, VideoArgus generates an output-blind, sample-specific rubric once and reuses it to evaluate all corresponding candidate videos. The rubric defines concrete criteria, scoring rules, failure modes, and evidence plans, which guide criterion-specific VLM QA and visual tools to produce evidence-grounded criterion scores, rationales, and a diagnostic report. We further construct VideoArgus-Bench, containing 1,026 curated input instances built from 653 high-quality images and 416 high-quality videos, with all benchmark rubrics pre-generated, frozen, and released. On a separate 1,260-video human-alignment set, VideoArgus achieves higher within-input Spearman and Kendall correlations with human judgments than the corresponding benchmark-specific evaluators across all five tasks. Model rankings also remain largely consistent across different rubric-generation and evaluation-VLM backbones. All code and data are released. Visit our project page: https://zzzmyyzeng.github.io/VideoArgus
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

video evaluation
rubric-based assessment
video generation
video editing
benchmarking
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

rubric-grounded evaluation
video generation
video editing
visual language models
unified benchmarking
πŸ”Ž Similar Papers
No similar papers found.