🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses a systematic blind spot in existing unlabeled reliability assessment methods based on consistency for vision–language chart understanding tasks, which fail to detect errors invariant under input perturbations. The paper formalizes this blind spot as the centralizer within a commutative algebraic structure and introduces a joint equivariance–consistency framework. By leveraging group actions and commutative algebra theory, the framework constructs matched sets of invariant and equivariant perturbations, yielding a computable, training-agnostic theory of unlabeled reliability. An Equivariance–Consistency Score detector is accordingly designed. Experiments on the REND-EQUIV benchmark validate the theoretical ranking predictions across three models and human annotations, demonstrating that the blind spot stems from relational semantics rather than implementation specifics, and that cyclic relabeling substantially enhances detection performance.
📝 Abstract
Label-free reliability for vision-language models rests on invariance: perturb the input and a faithful reader's answer should not change. This has a known blind spot, a systematic misreading survives the perturbation and gets certified wrong, which we show is computable, not just real: an error is invisible to an edit exactly when the two commute, so the errors a suite cannot reach form its joint centralizer, a set that shrinks as edits are added and can be written down rather than guessed at. We act on the complementary relation, equivariance: edit a figure's data and the correct answer must change by a computable amount. Two matched edits are provably complete for affine reading errors; no suite of swap edits is complete for label permutations, and cyclic relabeling closes most of that gap. We instantiate the theory as the Equivariance-Consistency Score, a label-free, training-free detector, and release REND-EQUIV, pairing matched invariance and equivariance sets over identical data. The predicted ordering holds across three models and a hand-labeled population immune to the one circularity in how it is selected; a second invariance-family method confirms the blind spot belongs to the relation, not to any implementation; and cyclic relabeling delivers its predicted gain on a matched real sample. The same characterization explains a reported inversion of this ordering in the classifier metamorphic-testing literature: detectability is a joint property of the relation and the fault class, never of the relation alone.