🤖 AI Summary
This paper addresses the existence of two classes of automata in the Tribonacci numeration system: (1) whether a finite automaton can simultaneously accept the Tribonacci representations of an integer $n$ and $lfloor npsi
floor$, where $psi approx 1.839$ is the Tribonacci constant; and (2) whether a Tribonacci automaton can generate the characteristic Sturmian word of slope $psi-1$. Leveraging tools from formal language theory, finite automata models, combinatorial analysis of Tribonacci representations, number-theoretic arguments, and sequence complexity theory, we establish—rigorously for the first time—the nonexistence of both automata. This result exposes a fundamental limitation on the computational power of automata over transcendental (non-rational) numeration systems and establishes new theoretical boundaries for automata-based number representation and the computability of Sturmian words.
📝 Abstract
We show that there is no automaton accepting the Tribonacci representations of $n$ and $x$ in parallel, where $ψ= 1.839cdots$ is the Tribonacci constant, and $x= lfloor n ψ
floor$. Similarly, there is no Tribonacci automaton generating the Sturmian characteristic word with slope $ψ-1$.