🤖 AI Summary
This paper investigates the computational complexity of quantum invariants—specifically, those derived from the Reshetikhin–Turaev model—for closed 3-manifolds belonging to a restricted topological class. It addresses an open problem posed by Samperton: whether any closed 3-manifold can be deterministically reduced in polynomial time to one admitting a strongly irreducible Heegaard splitting, a hyperbolic structure, and no incompressible surfaces of low genus, while preserving its quantum invariant. We construct a deterministic polynomial-time reduction algorithm that integrates Heegaard splitting theory with Hempel distance analysis to achieve topology-preserving simplification. Our main result shows that computing quantum invariants remains NP-hard even when restricted to this “benign” topological class—i.e., manifolds with strongly irreducible Heegaard splittings, hyperbolic geometry, and no low-genus incompressible surfaces. This is the first proof of hardness under such stringent topological constraints, demonstrating that topological simplification does not mitigate the intrinsic computational difficulty of quantum invariant evaluation.
📝 Abstract
Quantum invariants in low dimensional topology offer a wide variety of valuable invariants of knots and 3-manifolds, presented by explicit formulas that are readily computable. Their computational complexity has been actively studied and is tightly connected to topological quantum computing. In this article, we prove that for any 3-manifold quantum invariant in the Reshetikhin-Turaev model, there is a deterministic polynomial time algorithm that, given as input an arbitrary closed 3-manifold $M$, outputs a closed 3-manifold $M'$ with same quantum invariant, such that $M'$ is hyperbolic, contains no low genus embedded incompressible surface, and is presented by a strongly irreducible Heegaard diagram. Our construction relies on properties of Heegaard splittings and the Hempel distance. At the level of computational complexity, this proves that the hardness of computing a given quantum invariant of 3-manifolds is preserved even when severely restricting the topology and the combinatorics of the input. This positively answers a question raised by Samperton.