🤖 AI Summary
This work proposes the task of Simulating Organized Group Behavior, which treats entities such as corporations as unified agents and aims to predict their collective decisions given specific scenarios. To facilitate research in this direction, the authors establish a comprehensive platform comprising a formal task definition, an evaluation protocol, and an analytical framework. They further introduce the first structured, interpretable model tailored for group decision-making, incorporating three key innovations: a time-aware adapter, a group knowledge transfer mechanism, and traceable evidence nodes. Experiments on the GROVE benchmark—which encompasses 44 real-world entities and 8,052 scenario-decision pairs—demonstrate that the proposed approach substantially outperforms conventional summarization and retrieval baselines, achieving superior predictive performance while uncovering patterns of intra-group behavioral drift and inter-group structural similarities.
📝 Abstract
Simulating how organized groups (e.g., corporations) make decisions (e.g., responding to a competitor's move) is essential for understanding real-world dynamics and could benefit relevant applications (e.g., market prediction). In this paper, we formalize this problem as a concrete research platform for group behavior understanding, providing: (1) a task definition with benchmark and evaluation criteria, (2) a structured analytical framework with a corresponding algorithm, and (3) detailed temporal and cross-group analysis. Specifically, we propose Organized Group Behavior Simulation, a task that models organized groups as collective entities from a practical perspective: given a group facing a particular situation (e.g., AI Boom), predict the decision it would take. To support this task, we present GROVE (GRoup Organizational BehaVior Evaluation), a benchmark covering 44 entities with 8,052 real-world context-decision pairs collected from Wikipedia and TechCrunch across 9 domains, with an end-to-end evaluation protocol assessing consistency, initiative, scope, magnitude, and horizon. Beyond straightforward prompting pipelines, we propose a structured analytical framework that converts collective decision-making events into an interpretable, adaptive, and traceable behavioral model, achieving stronger performance than summarization- and retrieval-based baselines. It further introduces an adapter mechanism for time-aware evolution and group-aware transfer, and traceable evidence nodes grounding each decision rule in originating historical events. Our analysis reveals temporal behavioral drift within individual groups, which the time-aware adapter effectively captures for stronger prediction, and structured cross-group similarity that enables knowledge transfer for data-scarce organizations.