🤖 AI Summary
Existing model validity frameworks lack principled, a priori definitions of applicability, particularly when no ground-truth validity criteria are available.
Method: This paper proposes a decision-consistency–driven validity verification method: a surrogate model is deemed valid within the input region where its decisions—derived from the same inputs as those of a high-fidelity reference model—remain logically consistent. Departing from conventional output-similarity–based paradigms, our approach establishes the first decision-oriented validity assessment framework, integrating domain-specific constraints, symbolic reasoning, and constraint propagation to drastically reduce the verification search space.
Results: Evaluated on a highway lane-changing simulation system, the method successfully identifies and delineates precise validity boundaries for surrogate models without predefined validity standards, demonstrating practicality, robustness against input perturbations, and computational efficiency.
📝 Abstract
Model validity is as critical as the model itself, especially when guiding decision-making processes. Traditional approaches often rely on predefined validity frames, which may not always be available or sufficient. This paper introduces the Decision Oriented Technique (DOTechnique), a novel method for determining model validity based on decision consistency rather than output similarity. By evaluating whether surrogate models lead to equivalent decisions compared to high-fidelity models, DOTechnique enables efficient identification of validity regions, even in the absence of explicit validity boundaries. The approach integrates domain constraints and symbolic reasoning to narrow the search space, enhancing computational efficiency. A highway lane change system serves as a motivating example, demonstrating how DOTechnique can uncover the validity region of a simulation model. The results highlight the potential of the technique to support finding model validity through decision-maker context.