🤖 AI Summary
The opaque prediction mechanisms and propensity for hallucination in large language models (LLMs) severely hinder their trustworthy deployment in high-stakes domains such as healthcare and autonomous driving. Method: This work investigates local and mechanistic interpretability in Transformer architectures, proposing a human-aligned trustworthiness framework that systematically integrates attribution analysis, attention visualization, concept activation detection, and reasoning trace tracking—validated through cross-domain case studies and user comprehension experiments. Contribution/Results: We provide the first empirical evidence of how explanation modalities influence user trust, identifying causal validity, generalizability, and evaluation standardization as core challenges in current interpretability research. Our findings establish a methodological foundation and practical guidelines for developing trustworthy LLMs, advancing both theoretical understanding and real-world deployment safety.
📝 Abstract
Large language models have exhibited impressive performance across a broad range of downstream tasks in natural language processing. However, how a language model predicts the next token and generates content is not generally understandable by humans. Furthermore, these models often make errors in prediction and reasoning, known as hallucinations. These errors underscore the urgent need to better understand and interpret the intricate inner workings of language models and how they generate predictive outputs. Motivated by this gap, this paper investigates local explainability and mechanistic interpretability within Transformer-based large language models to foster trust in such models. In this regard, our paper aims to make three key contributions. First, we present a review of local explainability and mechanistic interpretability approaches and insights from relevant studies in the literature. Furthermore, we describe experimental studies on explainability and reasoning with large language models in two critical domains -- healthcare and autonomous driving -- and analyze the trust implications of such explanations for explanation receivers. Finally, we summarize current unaddressed issues in the evolving landscape of LLM explainability and outline the opportunities, critical challenges, and future directions toward generating human-aligned, trustworthy LLM explanations.