implement system interoperability

This study addresses critical challenges faced by regulated enterprises—including cross-system data inconsistencies, reconciliation difficulties, asset record drift, and overreliance on manual audits—by proposing the GERA framework. GERA innovatively integrates deterministic reconciliation, robust anomaly detection based on Z-Score and its variants, governance-driven semantic standardization, and NIST CSF 2.0 security controls within a four-layer architecture comprising ingestion, staging, core modeling, and semantic services. Empirical validation across banking, broadband service providers, and technology firms demonstrates that the framework significantly enhances reconciliation automation and audit readiness, effectively mitigating 39% of compliance deficiencies identified during PCAOB inspections.

Current RESTful API design quality assessment relies heavily on manual inspection, lacking early, automated validation mechanisms for non-functional requirements—particularly interoperability, modularity, and maintainability. Method: This paper proposes an OpenAPI-based static analysis approach that implements a configurable rule engine. It formalizes 75 design principles derived from scholarly literature and industry standards into structured, machine-checkable constraints, enabling customizable rule activation/deactivation and traceable feedback to align requirements engineering with architectural governance. Contribution/Results: Following the design science research paradigm, we developed and evaluated a prototype tool. Empirical evaluation and expert review demonstrate that the method significantly improves API design compliance and consistency, achieving 82% automation coverage. It effectively supports continuous architectural governance in agile development environments, bridging the gap between design-time assurance and operational API lifecycle management.

To address interdisciplinary interoperability, variant configuration governance, end-to-end traceability, and cross-organizational collaboration challenges arising from the networked evolution of Systems of Systems (SoS), this paper proposes a lifecycle management framework for Network-Centric Development (NCD). Methodologically, it grounds the framework in Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) semantics and integrates Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) governance, CAD-CAE model synchronization, and closed-loop digital thread/digital twin capabilities. Its core contributions are four foundational principles: (1) reference architecture with a unified data model; (2) end-to-end configuration sovereignty; (3) review-driven model gating; and (4) quantifiable value contribution assessment. Empirical validation across transportation, healthcare, and public-sector domains demonstrates significant improvements in change robustness and model reuse rate, reduced delivery cycles, and enhanced support for sustainability-oriented decision-making.

Prior work lacks empirical characterization of problem-solving processes in software development. Method: Integrating grounded theory coding, sequential pattern mining, and multidimensional statistical analysis on 356 Mozilla Firefox issue reports, this study extracts fine-grained, reusable problem-solving process patterns from collaborative textual artifacts. Contribution/Results: We identify 47 empirically grounded process patterns—challenging the traditional linear assumption by revealing pervasive nonlinearity: 73% of fixes involve iterative backtracking or parallel activities. The resulting process landscape and pattern catalog systematically characterize distributional regularities across issue types, defect categories, and repair durations. This advances understanding of real-world engineering complexity and provides an evidence-based foundation for process optimization, collaborative tool design, and developer support.

This study addresses the lack of systematic empirical investigation into the technical and integration challenges of deploying the Matter standard in practice. By analyzing over 13,000 developer issues from the official Project CHIP GitHub repository, this work employs topic modeling and qualitative content analysis to uncover key obstacles encountered during Matter implementation at scale. The research identifies four core challenge categories: testing, interoperability, development support, and platform networking. These findings provide the first community-driven empirical evidence and actionable recommendations for improving Matter’s test infrastructure, cross-vendor documentation, and developer toolchains.

Existing data pipelines often suffer from weak governance, leading to delayed schema validation, inconsistent cross-language execution, and misalignment with business semantics. This work proposes treating data contracts as types, leveraging the “everything-as-code” paradigm to inject schema annotations—encompassing column types, constraints, documentation, and lineage—into input and output tables within a lakehouse architecture via multi-language SDKs. These annotations are parsed across multiple phases of the execution lifecycle, deeply integrating data contracts into the type system. The approach enables both deterministic and non-deterministic reasoning over data flows across languages and execution engines, significantly enhancing the reliability of production data pipelines and ensuring consistent interoperability across systems.

This study addresses the limitations of current AI auditing practices, which predominantly focus on individual models while overlooking integration risks arising from interactions among system components and between systems and their environments. Through a scoping review and reflexive thematic analysis of 58 studies, the work systematically codes existing literature to delineate, for the first time, three distinct domains of AI integration auditing: inter-component, system–environment, and multi-system. It further introduces domain-specific evaluation dimensions—compatibility, completeness, and oversight—that capture unique aspects of integrated AI systems. The findings reveal that current auditing practices remain fragmented and nascent, underscoring the critical role of accessible information and resource support in effective audit design. The paper calls for novel auditing frameworks capable of spanning components, environments, and systems to enable systematic exploration, identification, coordination, and standardization of integration-related risks.