analyzing error patterns

This study addresses the lack of rigorous statistical assessment for the reliability of output structures in complex clustering pipelines that involve multiple data-dependent stages such as anomaly detection, feature selection, and clustering. To bridge this gap, the work systematically applies selective inference to the entire clustering analysis workflow, establishing a statistical framework that enables valid significance testing of final cluster assignments. The proposed method rigorously controls the type I error rate at any pre-specified nominal level and demonstrates strong empirical performance on both synthetic and real-world datasets. By doing so, it provides a principled and reliable foundation for statistical inference in multi-stage, data-driven clustering procedures.

This work addresses the unreliability of developer productivity dashboards, which often stems from ad hoc scripts that introduce undetected silent data gaps, eroding organizational trust. To resolve this, we propose a robust ELT pipeline grounded in DAG-based orchestration and the Medallion architecture, decoupling data extraction from transformation to preserve the immutability of raw data. Our approach introduces a state-driven dependency scheduling mechanism and, for the first time, treats metric pipelines as production-grade distributed systems. We emphasize the critical role of immutable raw history in enabling reliable metric redefinition. This methodology significantly enhances data reliability and freshness while effectively eliminating silent failures, thereby restoring organizational confidence in DevOps metrics.

This work addresses the challenge that domain experts face in translating natural language descriptions of data quality requirements into executable analyses, a process often hindered by reliance on data engineers, resulting in inefficiency and high technical barriers. To overcome this, the paper proposes a no-code, model-driven pipeline that leverages a QPM metamodel to define domain-specific quality analysis templates. Coupled with the Constrainify toolchain, it automatically transforms natural language requirements into executable and reusable analytical logic. By integrating model-driven engineering, metamodeling, and no-code web technologies, the approach significantly reduces dependency on technical expertise, enabling efficient, reproducible, and semantically aligned data quality assessments. This advancement enhances both the accessibility and automation of data quality analysis for non-technical domain practitioners.

This work addresses the growing complexity of CI/CD pipelines and the lack of structured analysis capabilities in existing tools for understanding their behavior, failures, and version evolution. The authors propose an innovative approach that uniquely integrates digital twin technology with BPMN-based modeling in DevOps contexts. By automatically parsing raw CI configurations and execution logs, the method constructs structured, high-level process models that enable pipeline visualization, failure traceability, and cross-version comparison. Evaluated across multiple open-source projects, the approach demonstrates effectiveness in monitoring, evolutionary analysis, and fault diagnosis, offering a modular and extensible foundational framework for the analysis and optimization of CI/CD pipelines.

This study addresses hidden errors in large language model (LLM) evaluation arising from unquantified factors such as prompt rewrites, changes in judge models, or temperature variations, which can destabilize results and even reverse model rankings. The work presents the first systematic decomposition of these error sources, distinguishing between random variance—diminishing with increased data—and systematic bias sensitive to design choices. It proposes an optimized evaluation pipeline leveraging variance decomposition, few-shot estimation, and projection-based optimization. Empirical results across multitask benchmarks including MMLU demonstrate that, at equivalent computational cost, the method reduces estimation error by 50%, outperforms 73% of baseline evaluation protocols, and yields confidence intervals achieving near-nominal coverage—substantially enhancing evaluation robustness and mitigating noise overfitting.

This work addresses the pervasive issue of redundant and isolated messages in system logs, which hinder downstream tasks such as model reasoning and anomaly detection. To tackle this challenge, the authors propose LogPurifier—the first task-agnostic log cleansing framework—that systematically purifies logs by extracting log templates and modeling their dependencies to accurately identify and remove messages irrelevant to system functional behavior. By doing so, LogPurifier enables effective log sanitization applicable across diverse analytical scenarios. Experimental results demonstrate that LogPurifier substantially improves both accuracy and efficiency in various downstream tasks, thereby validating its effectiveness and generalizability.

Community-driven scientific workflow ecosystems often struggle to sustain themselves due to ambiguous maintenance and user support mechanisms, particularly in cross-platform collaboration and heterogeneous execution environments. This study presents the first cross-platform empirical analysis of the nf-core ecosystem, systematically examining 15,760 GitHub issues, 35,411 pull requests, and 895 forum discussions. By integrating metadata and textual features into predictive models, the research uncovers significant disparities in maintenance and support activities across platforms and highlights weak explicit linkages among them. The findings reveal that issues, pull requests, and forum posts predominantly serve distinct roles—coordinating maintenance, facilitating code integration, and providing user support, respectively. Moreover, issue actionability, diagnostic evidence, and depth of interaction emerge as critical determinants of resolution efficiency.

This work addresses the challenge of behavioral inconsistency in automatically generated BPMN models due to semantic ambiguity in natural language process descriptions. It proposes the first closed-loop diagnosis and repair framework that operates without requiring ground-truth BPMN annotations. By analyzing the distribution of key performance indicators (KPIs) across multiple model generations, the approach identifies behavioral variations and employs model-based diagnostic techniques to pinpoint gateway logic discrepancies. These discrepancies are traced back to specific source text fragments, which are then refined through an evidence-driven textual revision process. Evaluated on clinical guidelines for diabetic kidney disease management, the method significantly reduces behavioral variability in regenerated models and enhances the semantic stability of executable process models, establishing an end-to-end mapping from behavioral inconsistency to targeted textual correction.

This work addresses the heavy reliance on expert knowledge in designing and debugging scientific workflows, a challenge exacerbated by existing large language model approaches that directly generate code without ensuring transparency, reproducibility, or seamless system integration. To overcome these limitations, we propose an AI-assisted scientific workflow management framework that decouples user intent from implementation through a structured specification phase, enabling specification-driven workflow generation and validation. We further introduce a multi-layer debugging agent powered by large language models to automate error diagnosis and correction. By deeply integrating with the Pegasus workflow system via the Model Context Protocol (MCP), our approach supports end-to-end workflow lifecycle management. Empirical evaluation demonstrates successful generation and execution of federated learning medical imaging workflows comprising thousands of tasks, substantially reducing debugging effort and empowering non-expert users to construct complex workflows adhering to expert-level design patterns.