cross-platform development

Current RESTful API design quality assessment relies heavily on manual inspection, lacking early, automated validation mechanisms for non-functional requirements—particularly interoperability, modularity, and maintainability. Method: This paper proposes an OpenAPI-based static analysis approach that implements a configurable rule engine. It formalizes 75 design principles derived from scholarly literature and industry standards into structured, machine-checkable constraints, enabling customizable rule activation/deactivation and traceable feedback to align requirements engineering with architectural governance. Contribution/Results: Following the design science research paradigm, we developed and evaluated a prototype tool. Empirical evaluation and expert review demonstrate that the method significantly improves API design compliance and consistency, achieving 82% automation coverage. It effectively supports continuous architectural governance in agile development environments, bridging the gap between design-time assurance and operational API lifecycle management.

This paper addresses the conceptual ambiguity, ill-defined boundaries, and lack of implementation standards between Infrastructure-as-Code (IaC) and Pipeline-as-Code in DevOps practice. To resolve these issues, we systematically delineate their respective roles and synergistic mechanisms within the DevOps ecosystem and propose a reusable, standardized IaC-driven CI/CD implementation framework. Our approach integrates Terraform for infrastructure provisioning, Ansible for configuration management, GitLab CI for pipeline orchestration, and Docker/Kubernetes for containerized deployment—enabling an end-to-end automated delivery pipeline. Empirical evaluation demonstrates 99.8% configuration change accuracy, reduces environment provisioning time from hours to minutes, and significantly improves deployment consistency and delivery efficiency.

This work addresses the challenges in edge and embedded application development—namely, heterogeneous software stacks, multi-language runtimes, and difficult debugging—which lead to rigid deployment workflows and complex fault diagnosis. To overcome these limitations, the paper proposes a novel architecture enabling unified end-edge-cloud development. Its core components include a single programming language, a retargetable runtime system, a local recording and replay mechanism for distributed events, and a cross-platform deployment framework. This design breaks down traditional debugging barriers in edge–cloud collaborative development, facilitating seamless scalability, consistent testing, and flexible deployment across heterogeneous environments. Evaluation of the prototype system demonstrates that the proposed approach significantly simplifies deployment procedures and enhances fault diagnosis efficiency.

This paper addresses the challenges of weak consistency and high maintenance costs in software platform architecture evolution. We propose symmetry as a foundational architectural design principle: by identifying structural invariants—such as interfaces and behavioral specifications—under transformations (e.g., module replacement, deployment migration), we construct a formal architectural model incorporating symmetry constraints. Methodologically, we integrate group-theoretic modeling with structural analysis to quantitatively characterize the intrinsic relationship between architectural robustness and symmetry. Empirical and theoretical results demonstrate that symmetry constraints significantly improve system-wide consistency, reduce evolutionary complexity, and enhance scalability, reliability, and maintainability. To our knowledge, this work establishes the first systematic theoretical framework and formal modeling methodology for software architecture symmetry, offering a novel paradigm for designing resilient, evolvable platforms.

This study addresses the lack of systematic guidance for enterprise software teams in choosing between monolithic and microservices architectures. The work proposes a decision-making framework that integrates technical and organizational factors, evaluating the trade-offs of each architecture across dimensions such as scalability, reliability, deployment efficiency, and organizational complexity. The assessment is grounded in system scale, business requirements, operational maturity, and long-term maintainability. Through architectural pattern analysis, a structured evaluation model, and multiple case studies, the authors develop a practical selection methodology tailored to real-world engineering contexts. This approach offers enterprises clear architectural evolution pathways and actionable guidelines aligned with their developmental stages, thereby significantly enhancing the rationality and sustainability of system design decisions.

This study addresses the proliferation of functional redundancy in service-oriented architectures caused by heterogeneous clients, which undermines system evolvability and maintainability. To mitigate this issue, the authors propose a novel reference architecture that synergistically integrates metadata-driven mechanisms with pattern languages. By leveraging metadata management and a plugin-based design, the approach effectively constrains service redundancy while enhancing reuse capabilities. The work innovatively combines metadata mechanisms and pattern languages in architectural construction and validates its efficacy through a triangulated evaluation method incorporating scenario-based assessment and real-world case studies. Empirical results demonstrate that the majority of system changes during evolution require no code modifications—only configuration adjustments or the addition of pluggable components—thereby significantly improving architectural stability and reuse efficiency.

This work addresses the challenge of silent updates to large language models (LLMs) by service providers, which often occur without version changes and can lead to behavioral drift and functional regressions, while existing mechanisms lack deployment-side control over compatibility governance. Framing LLM updates as a software supply chain governance problem, this study proposes a deployment-side control framework that defines rule-based production contracts, constructs risk-category-oriented test suites, and enforces compatibility gates to validate model safety and performance prior to updates. Experimental results demonstrate that the approach effectively uncovers fine-grained regressions missed by aggregate metrics, while also highlighting critical challenges in test design, threshold calibration, and drift attribution.

This work addresses the challenge of balancing software quality, testability, and maintainability under rapid iteration and frequent requirement changes. It proposes Algorithm-Driven Development (ADD), a novel approach that unifies requirements specification and technical design by using algorithm flowcharts as a single, coherent artifact. This integration enables end-to-end modeling of requirements, architecture, and testing. Leveraging this model, the system automatically generates high-coverage acceptance tests and incorporates continuous integration with code coverage feedback. Industrial adoption at Dassault Systèmes demonstrates that ADD achieves over 95% code coverage, substantially reduces defect density, and ensures a stable delivery cadence, outperforming conventional test-driven development and test-after approaches.