kill-switch mechanisms

Designs, implements, and evaluates mechanisms that intentionally disable, halt, or terminate operation of an engineered system when specified triggers or conditions occur. Work includes specifying trigger logic and safe-state behavior, implementing authentication, fail‑safes, and irreversibility/recoverability modes, and modeling, verifying, testing, and analyzing robustness and risks of unintended shutdowns.

kill-switchmechanisms

Recent Skill Trend

Momentum and market value over time
Trending
Score
No comparison yet
0.17
Oct 01, 2026Oct 01, 2026
Career
Value
No comparison yet
$200K/year
Oct 01, 2026Oct 01, 2026

Must-Read Papers

Most classic and influential ideas
View more

论文探讨了如何通过形式化验证方法提高软件驱动的人造器官的安全性,该方法能证明代码在所有允许执行情况下的正确性。

formal verificationsafetySaMD

Failure Modes and Effects Analysis: An Experience from the E-Bike Domain

Sep 19, 2025
AB
Andrea Bombarda
🏛️ University of Bergamo | McMaster University

This study addresses safety risks arising from software faults in cyber-physical systems (CPS) for electric bicycles. We propose a simulation-driven functional Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) method, leveraging Simulink Fault Analyzer to construct fault models, integrated with expert review and a systematic FMEA process to close the loop among fault modeling, simulation-based analysis, and impact assessment. Experimental evaluation identified 13 real-world faults with 100% model accuracy; among them, five revealed previously unrecognized safety implications, and 38.4% induced anomalous system behavior. The study distills ten reusable engineering practice guidelines, significantly enhancing the effectiveness and practicality of FMEA in industrial-scale CPS. It provides empirical validation and methodological contributions toward the operational deployment of simulation-driven safety analysis.

Evaluating simulation-driven FMEA effectiveness in e-Bike safety analysisModeling 13 realistic faults to detect CPS safety breachesValidating model accuracy and fault impact through expert feedback

Formalizing Operational Design Domains with the Pkl Language

Sep 02, 2025
MS
Martin Skoglund
🏛️ RISE Research Institutes of Sweden | MRTC | Mälardalen University

Current operational design domain (ODD) specifications for high-level automated driving systems lack formal foundations, undermining safety argument traceability and impeding integrated development and verification. To address this, this paper proposes a formal ODD modeling method based on the Pkl configuration language. Leveraging Pkl’s structured syntax, type safety, and modular organization, the approach enables machine-readable, verifiable ODD representations and supports end-to-end traceable evidence generation—from requirements definition to safety assurance. Evaluated on representative automotive scenarios, the method significantly improves ODD description precision, specification consistency, and assessment efficiency. Its core contribution lies in the first systematic adoption of Pkl for ODD modeling, uniquely balancing expressive flexibility with the rigor and engineering practicality demanded by functional safety standards. The approach demonstrates strong cross-domain applicability across automated systems.

Addressing specification flexibility while maintaining consistencyFormalizing Operational Design Domains for automated systemsIntegrating ODD into development and validation processes

This work addresses the security risks associated with executing industrial control software on unauthorized hardware, a challenge inadequately mitigated by conventional protection mechanisms that often fail to balance security and functional correctness. The authors propose a novel hardware-software binding approach that integrates Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) with symbolic execution to enforce program behavior constraints and verify critical security properties. This method ensures that the software operates correctly only on authorized target devices while maintaining secure behavior—even in the presence of unauthorized execution environments or PUF failures. Notably, this study is the first to leverage symbolic execution for preserving software security properties under anomalous execution conditions, thereby achieving a robust combination of strong anti-reverse-engineering capabilities and high reliability.

industrial control softwarePhysically Unclonable Functionsreverse engineering

Latest Papers

What's happening recently
View more

This work addresses the persistent reliance on manual intervention for recovering from faults in process plants that fall outside predefined monitoring logic. To enhance automation and safety, the authors propose a knowledge-guided large language model (LLM) agent framework that functions as a constrained supervisory planner. By integrating domain-specific plant knowledge, the framework generates safe recovery actions and ensures execution reliability through symbolic or simulation-based verification mechanisms. The study innovatively defines three core design dimensions for LLM agents in this context: fault recovery patterns, verification strategies, and deployment constraints. Additionally, it provides two open-source Python environments to facilitate reproduction of canonical cases and support user-defined extensions, thereby significantly advancing the automation and safety of fault recovery in industrial settings.

Fault recoveryOperator dependenceProcess plants

本文提出Agile-V Assurance Spine,通过权威源配置文件、工件绑定、风险适当独立性和时效性等方法解决工程生命周期中对代理输出的正当行动问题。

assurance problemcontinuous assuranceengineering lifecycle

This work addresses the challenge in safety-critical systems where complexity hinders development teams from fully comprehending system behavior and providing trustworthy explanations. To bridge this gap, the paper proposes Behavior-Driven Explainability (BDX), a method that directly translates structured scenarios from Behavior-Driven Development (BDD) into formal behavioral specifications and automatically generates user-oriented explainable outputs. BDX seamlessly integrates system specification with explanation generation, making it applicable across any development phase and abstraction level. The approach is validated through a case study on exception handling in a RISC-V processor, demonstrating that BDX effectively supports explainability requirements early in the design process, thereby significantly enhancing system transparency and trustworthiness.

Behavior-Driven Developmentexplainabilitysafety-critical systems

Hot Scholars

XW

Xinchao Wang

National University of Singapore
Machine LearningAIComputer VisionImage Processing
YL

Yuekang Li

Lecturer (Assistant Professor), University of New South Wales
Software EngineeringSoftware SecurityAI Red Teaming
XM

Xinyin Ma

National University of Singapore
Efficient Deep LearningLarge Language ModelDiffusion Model
LF

Lubin Fan

Alibaba Cloud
Computer GraphicsComputer VisionMLLM
YZ

Yixiong Zou

Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Computer visionDomain generalizationFew-shot learningVision-language model