Score
Designs, builds, and interprets analytical systems, models, diagnostics, metrics and controls that use operations data to measure, monitor, and report on operational performance, costs and efficiency. Creates operational frameworks, model artifacts, and support processes to diagnose inefficiencies, recommend strategy adjustments, and implement operational simplicity and effective controls.
Business process optimization remains challenging due to fragmented methodologies across process mining, predictive process monitoring, and process-aware recommendation—each operating in isolation without a unified theoretical foundation or integration framework. Method: This paper proposes a closed-loop optimization framework that systematically integrates Alpha algorithm/Inductive Miner for process discovery, LSTM/Transformer for runtime prediction, collaborative filtering/graph neural networks for action recommendation, and explainable AI (XAI) for interpretability—enabling automated bottleneck identification, anomaly forecasting, and prescriptive optimization from event logs. Contribution/Results: We establish the first unified conceptual boundary, evolutionary taxonomy, and synergy paradigm across the three domains; construct a comprehensive classification schema covering 120+ studies; clarify application scopes and standardized evaluation benchmarks; and deliver an industrially actionable methodology selection guide with validated deployment pathways.
Ad hoc SQL development lacks engineering rigor, leading to data silos, logical redundancy, and ineffective data governance. Method: This paper proposes a DataOps-driven CI/CD framework for analytical SQL warehouses, featuring a novel five-stage automated pipeline—Lint, Optimize, Parse, Validate, Observe—that embeds quality assurance and enables end-to-end lifecycle governance. Contribution/Results: We introduce the DataOps Controls Scorecard and a requirements traceability matrix, explicitly mapping 12 governance criteria to CI/CD stages to ensure control completeness and scalability. The framework integrates Agile, Lean, and DevOps principles with static analysis, syntactic parsing, optimization recommendations, validation testing, and observability. Empirical evaluation demonstrates significant improvements in data quality, development transparency, and cross-functional collaboration, providing a sustainable, production-ready pathway for large-scale analytical systems.
To address challenges in Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) development—including heterogeneous formal models, fragmented storage of modeling artifacts, inadequate version management, and limited knowledge reuse—this paper proposes an ontology-driven engineering knowledge graph framework. It introduces a unified systems engineering ontology built upon the custom Ontology Modelling Language (OML), enabling semantic integration of modeling artifacts across formal methods (e.g., SysML, UML, Modelica). The framework integrates a workflow engine, SPARQL querying, SWRL rule-based reasoning, and versioned graph storage to implicitly encapsulate complex knowledge graph operations. It is the first to support full-lifecycle semantic interoperability and automated knowledge discovery. Evaluated on an electric-drive intelligent sensor system, the framework significantly improves model version management efficiency, accelerates information retrieval, and uncovers three categories of latent engineering knowledge via inference.
This study addresses the lack of a systematic framework for identifying critical input variables and conducting sensitivity analysis under uncertainty in complex simulations, particularly in military decision-making contexts. The authors propose a unified sensitivity analysis framework that integrates local and global methods—including variance-based, derivative-based, screening, and uncertainty quantification techniques—and strategically maps these approaches to specific decision objectives such as factor prioritization, fixing, variance reduction, and mapping. Innovatively, the framework introduces a “sensitivity audit” mechanism to enhance traceability of model assumptions and promote responsible model usage. By providing a structured guide for high-dimensional, complex simulation systems, this work significantly improves model interpretability, transparency, and the credibility of decisions derived from such models.
This work addresses the unreliability of developer productivity dashboards, which often stems from ad hoc scripts that introduce undetected silent data gaps, eroding organizational trust. To resolve this, we propose a robust ELT pipeline grounded in DAG-based orchestration and the Medallion architecture, decoupling data extraction from transformation to preserve the immutability of raw data. Our approach introduces a state-driven dependency scheduling mechanism and, for the first time, treats metric pipelines as production-grade distributed systems. We emphasize the critical role of immutable raw history in enabling reliable metric redefinition. This methodology significantly enhances data reliability and freshness while effectively eliminating silent failures, thereby restoring organizational confidence in DevOps metrics.
This work addresses the growing complexity of CI/CD pipelines and the lack of structured analysis capabilities in existing tools for understanding their behavior, failures, and version evolution. The authors propose an innovative approach that uniquely integrates digital twin technology with BPMN-based modeling in DevOps contexts. By automatically parsing raw CI configurations and execution logs, the method constructs structured, high-level process models that enable pipeline visualization, failure traceability, and cross-version comparison. Evaluated across multiple open-source projects, the approach demonstrates effectiveness in monitoring, evolutionary analysis, and fault diagnosis, offering a modular and extensible foundational framework for the analysis and optimization of CI/CD pipelines.
This study addresses a critical gap in geriatric care research, which has predominantly emphasized operational efficiency while lacking robust connections to clinical health outcomes. Through a systematic review of 30 interdisciplinary studies at the intersection of industrial engineering and operations research applied to elderly care, the work categorizes existing literature into three thematic domains: home-based medical care, polypharmacy management, and chronotherapeutic clinical scheduling. It proposes a novel conceptual framework that explicitly links operational optimization with clinical outcomes, advocating a paradigm shift from isolated task-level improvements toward integrated, multi-layer decision-making. By incorporating human-centered design, systems analysis, and emerging technologies such as digital twins and large language models, the study highlights the field’s current overemphasis on workforce scheduling at the expense of health impact, thereby laying a theoretical and technical foundation for intelligent care decision systems spanning hospital and community settings.
This study addresses the growing complexity of operating large-scale computing infrastructures, such as high-performance computing (HPC) systems, where existing operational data analytics (ODA) frameworks struggle to effectively support multi-layered, distributed graph processing ecosystems. The work provides a systematic review of core ODA components, benchmarks prevailing approaches, and proposes a novel holistic ODA framework that integrates the distributed graph processing hierarchy introduced by Sherif Sak et al., thereby extending the functional scope of Netti et al.’s prior work. By unifying fine-grained monitoring, ODA architecture, and graph processing system design, the proposed framework significantly enhances structural integrity and functional extensibility, markedly improving operational efficiency. Furthermore, it illuminates key research directions for ODA in high-performance computing environments.
This work addresses the challenge that domain experts face in translating natural language descriptions of data quality requirements into executable analyses, a process often hindered by reliance on data engineers, resulting in inefficiency and high technical barriers. To overcome this, the paper proposes a no-code, model-driven pipeline that leverages a QPM metamodel to define domain-specific quality analysis templates. Coupled with the Constrainify toolchain, it automatically transforms natural language requirements into executable and reusable analytical logic. By integrating model-driven engineering, metamodeling, and no-code web technologies, the approach significantly reduces dependency on technical expertise, enabling efficient, reproducible, and semantically aligned data quality assessments. This advancement enhances both the accessibility and automation of data quality analysis for non-technical domain practitioners.