machine learning models

This study addresses the prevailing gap in AI education, which emphasizes model development while neglecting system engineering practices, leaving students ill-equipped to handle real-world challenges such as architectural design, deployment, and monitoring. To bridge this gap, the authors implemented a master’s-level course in which students built a movie recommendation system under realistic constraints, with a focus on integrating AI components into robust software systems, adopting data-driven machine learning practices, and cultivating systems-level thinking. Using a mixed-methods approach—combining analysis of student project artifacts with survey data—the research evaluates learners’ performance in architectural decision-making, integration of heterogeneous models, and adaptation to evolving requirements. Findings reveal common difficulties students encounter in AI system engineering and demonstrate the course’s effectiveness in addressing critical deficiencies in AI engineering education and enhancing systems-aware competencies.

Medical AI deployment is hindered by insufficient production readiness of machine learning (ML) training pipelines. Method: This paper presents a progressive architectural evolution path—monolithic (chaotic) → modular monolithic → microservices—using SPIRA, a voice-based pre-diagnostic system for respiratory insufficiency, as a case study. It systematically introduces continuous training (CT) and a software-quality-attribute-driven MLOps governance framework tailored to healthcare, integrating modular design, microservice decomposition, and engineered CI/CD pipelines. Contribution/Results: The approach significantly improves pipeline maintainability, fault tolerance, and scalability, enabling stable, iterative evolution of SPIRA. It establishes an “agile ML + robust software engineering” co-design paradigm, delivering a reusable methodology and practical benchmark for engineering medical AI in highly regulated environments.

This paper identifies a systemic issue in machine learning: preprocessing hyperparameters—such as missing-value imputation strategies—are frequently overlooked yet substantially bias model evaluation. Current practice often involves informal, post-hoc tuning of preprocessing steps, leading to optimistic performance estimates and irreproducible results. To address this, the authors formally distinguish and empirically analyze the coupling effects between algorithmic and preprocessing hyperparameters. Using a modular supervised learning workflow model, controlled variable experiments, replication of canonical case studies, and bias diagnostics, they quantify the resulting optimistic bias. Key contributions include: (1) establishing preprocessing hyperparameters as equally critical as algorithmic ones; (2) proposing formal modeling principles to eliminate informal preprocessing tuning; and (3) delivering actionable reporting guidelines for ML practitioners, thereby significantly enhancing model credibility and reproducibility.

This paper addresses the inefficiency and lack of scalability of manual hyperparameter tuning in large-scale machine learning. It systematically surveys hyperparameter optimization (HPO), unifying and classifying five mainstream paradigms: random/low-discrepancy search, bandit-based methods, Bayesian optimization, population-based (evolutionary) algorithms, and gradient-based differentiable optimization. The survey further extends to emerging settings—including online HPO, constrained HPO, and multi-objective HPO. Crucially, the work establishes novel theoretical connections between HPO and meta-learning as well as neural architecture search, yielding a comprehensive knowledge framework that articulates methodological principles, applicability boundaries, and inherent limitations. By clarifying the technical evolution and identifying key open challenges, this study provides a theoretically grounded yet practically actionable foundation for automated machine learning.

Increasing complexity in AI systems has led to high code redundancy, poor reusability, and escalating maintenance costs. Method: This paper proposes the first systematic object-oriented programming (OOP) mapping framework tailored for AI engineering practice. It deeply integrates core OOP principles—encapsulation, inheritance, and polymorphism—across the entire ML/DL/LLM pipeline (data preprocessing, model training, evaluation, and deployment), augmented by design patterns such as Factory and Strategy to construct a reusable AI component library and modular architecture. Contribution/Results: The framework introduces a semantic modeling methodology that formally aligns OOP principles with AI workflows and provides native Python support. Empirical evaluation demonstrates over 30% reduction in code redundancy and significantly improved cross-project component reuse, thereby enabling maintainable, iterative development of industrial-scale AI systems.

This study addresses the widespread absence of systematic instruction on building, testing, deploying, and maintaining AI/ML systems in current undergraduate software engineering (SE) curricula. It presents the first comprehensive delineation of core AI/ML topics essential for SE practice, integrating curriculum mapping analysis, instructor needs surveys, and structured modeling to identify critical content gaps in existing programs. Grounded in empirical evidence, the work proposes actionable pathways for embedding high-priority AI/ML themes into established SE courses. The resulting framework offers a practical, implementable guide to enhance SE education’s capacity to support the development of intelligent software systems.

Current AI research often treats models as static artifacts, overlooking the fundamental influence of training dynamics on critical properties such as capability, bias, robustness, and safety. This work proposes shifting the focus toward the training process itself to establish a science of AI centered on training dynamics. By analyzing the interactions among data, objectives, architectures, and optimizers, the paper develops a theoretical framework that is predictive, intervenable, and design-oriented. Integrating approaches from mechanistic interpretability, fairness, memory mechanisms, and simplicity biases, it uncovers causal links between early-training signals and final model behavior. The study systematically outlines key challenges and open problems, offering both theoretical pathways and practical foundations for extending scaling laws beyond performance to encompass multidimensional model attributes.

This study addresses the prevalent ad hoc and non-standardized practices in model integration and deployment within MLOps projects, which often stem from a lack of systematic architectural guidance. To bridge this gap, the authors conduct a gray literature review of 103 online sources and apply thematic analysis to derive, for the first time, 25 architecturally significant best practices. These practices are systematically categorized into five thematic groups, with explicit articulation of each practice’s impact on overall system architecture. The resulting framework offers a structured, actionable set of guidelines for MLOps model integration and deployment, providing both researchers and engineering teams with a coherent theoretical foundation and practical reference for designing robust, scalable machine learning systems.

This work addresses the lack of systematic methodologies in model optimization, which often relies on heuristic choices and struggles to accommodate diverse deployment constraints. It formalizes model compression and acceleration as a constraint-aware multi-objective engineering decision problem, establishing a unified and actionable framework grounded in five key dimensions: data availability, latency, memory footprint, accuracy tolerance, and retraining budget. By integrating techniques such as quantization, pruning, knowledge distillation, parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT), and inference optimization, the study proposes tailored optimization pipelines for four representative industrial scenarios, delivering a reproducible and quantifiable guide for technology selection.

This work proposes the first end-to-end automated artificial intelligence research framework capable of fully automating the development pipeline from algorithmic idea generation to executable machine learning classifiers. The approach integrates structured meta-prompt engineering with large language model–based code generation, augmented by an automated evaluation and iterative optimization mechanism. Experimental results on twenty standard datasets from the Infinity-Bench benchmark demonstrate that multiple novel classifiers autonomously generated by the framework significantly outperform baseline methods implemented in scikit-learn. This study thus achieves, for the first time, complete automation of the entire workflow—from initial algorithmic conception to deployable, runnable code—marking a significant step toward self-driving AI research systems.