đ¤ AI Summary
This study addresses the absence of auditable, multi-signal governance standards for dynamically switching AI autonomy in human-AI collaboration. To tackle this challenge, the work proposes a handover problem framework that constructs a Handover Readiness Score (HRS) by fusing multidimensional signals. By integrating hysteresis-based transition strategies with hard safety guardrails, the framework achieves reversible, recoverable, and auditable control over autonomy allocation. The primary contribution lies in establishing the first foundation for autonomy governance based on explicit composite criteria to mitigate complementary failure modes. Validated through applications in software engineering and manufacturing domains, the proposed approach effectively resolves the limitation of single-metric systems in detecting the gradual erosion of operational readiness.
đ Abstract
Human-machine systems rarely operate at a fixed level of AI autonomy. As operators and AI systems collaborate over time, control must shift: the AI can take on more responsibility when collaboration is stable, maintain its current role when evidence is ambiguous, or return control to the human when conditions deteriorate. Existing work on adaptive automation, supervisory control, trust in automation, and deskilling explains parts of this problem, but provides no auditable, multi-signal criterion for governing when autonomy should change across multi-cycle workflows.
We formalise this challenge as the Handover Problem: deciding, at each operational cycle, whether to escalate, maintain, or revert AI autonomy while keeping the process reversible, recoverable, and auditable. We introduce the Handover Readiness Score (HRS), a transparent composite measure that integrates four signal dimensions: operator readiness, human-AI trust, learning stability, and operational performance. It is combined with a hysteresis-based transition policy that requires sustained positive evidence before increasing autonomy but reverts promptly when conditions worsen.
Across software engineering and manufacturing domains, the HRS and hard safety guards address complementary failure regimes: guards enforce immediate corrective action when a single indicator breaches a critical threshold, while the HRS detects the slow, multi-signal erosion of operator readiness that no individual guard can observe. The framework establishes autonomy handover as a governance problem requiring explicit, composite, and auditable criteria. This provides a conceptual and formal foundation that adaptive automation research has not previously provided.