Atoms to Processes: The Role of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Chemical Engineering

📅 2026-10-01
📈 Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses critical bottlenecks in artificial intelligence models for chemical engineering, including prediction inaccuracies, data scarcity, and limited interpretability, by exploring the deep integration of AI with first-principles modeling. Methodologically, this work proposes a paradigm shift from purely black-box approaches to physics-informed hybrid frameworks, synergizing atomistic simulations, process systems engineering, and physics-informed neural networks to ensure strict adherence to thermodynamic consistency and physical conservation laws. Consequently, the project significantly enhances predictive robustness and reliability while enabling efficient human–machine collaboration. By safeguarding engineering safety, this research amplifies the scientific value of core chemical engineering principles.
📝 Abstract
The rapid maturation of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) has catalyzed a profound shift in how chemical engineering problems are formulated, analyzed, and solved. Advances in computing, data availability, and learning algorithms have enabled AI/ML methods to impact applications spanning atomic-scale simulations, materials and catalyst discovery, transport and thermodynamics, separations, process systems engineering, and industrial operations. This article provides a perspective on recent methodological developments and representative applications, emphasizing how AI/ML tools are being integrated with first-principles models to address challenges of predictive accuracy, data scarcity, extrapolation, interpretability, and model lifecycle management. Across domains, a unifying trend is the move away from purely black-box approaches toward hybrid and physics-informed frameworks that explicitly respect conservation laws, thermodynamic consistency, and known structural constraints. These approaches not only improve robustness and reliability, but also enable meaningful human-AI collaboration by providing information at an appropriate level of abstraction for the task and decision context. We conclude that AI and ML are not replacing the core principles of chemical engineering; rather, they are amplifying them. As the field advances toward increasingly autonomous, adaptive, and sustainable systems, the thoughtful integration of AI/ML with first-principles understanding and domain expertise will be essential to realizing their full potential across both research and industrial practice.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Artificial Intelligence
Machine Learning
Chemical Engineering
Predictive Accuracy
Data Scarcity
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Physics-informed frameworks
Hybrid models
First-principles integration
Machine learning
Chemical engineering
💼 Related Jobs
No related jobs found.
Michael Baldea
Michael Baldea
Professor, University of Texas at Austin; Editor in Chief, I&ECR
Process Systems EngineeringSmart ManufacturingProcess IntensificationProcess Electrification
L
Linda J. Broadbelt
Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA
M
Marianthi G. Ierapetritou
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA
A
Akhilesh Jain
Advanced Analytics and AI, Baker Hughes
Ankur Kumar
Ankur Kumar
University of California Los Angeles
T
Thomas A. Kwan
Schneider Electric Research Institute, Schneider Electric, Boston, MA 02108, USA; Institute for Global Sustainability, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA
F
Fèlix Llovell
Department of Chemical Engineering, ETSEQ, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43007 Tarragona, Spain
A
Andrew J. Medford
School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA
I
Ilias Mitrai
McKetta Department of Chemical Engineering and Oden Institute for Chemical Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78731, USA
Joel Paulson
Joel Paulson
Battist Associate Professor of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Bayesian OptimizationModel Predictive ControlUncertainty QuantificationMachine Leaning
J
Junyi Qiao
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117585
M
Matthew P. Rivera
Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
K
Kirti C. Sahu
Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad, Kandi - 502 204, Sangareddy, Telangana, India
L
Lev Sarkisov
Department of Chemical Engineering, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom
Z
Zachary P. Smith
Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
Calvin Tsay
Calvin Tsay
Imperial College London, Department of Computing
OptimizationMachine LearningProcess Systems EngineeringProcess Control
C
Ching-Mei Wen
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA
V
Victor M. Zavala
Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA
H
Huacheng Zhang
Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia
D
Dan Zhao
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117585