LOInK: Learned Optimal Inverse Kinematics via Structured Neural Surrogate Models

πŸ“… 2026-09-17
πŸ“ˆ Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
πŸ“„ PDF
πŸ€– AI Summary
提出LOInKζ–Ήζ³•οΌŒι€šθΏ‡η»“ζž„εŒ–η₯žη»δ»£η†ζ¨‘εž‹ε­¦δΉ ι€†θΏεŠ¨ε­¦ηš„θΏ‘δΌΌζœ€δΌ˜θ§£οΌŒζœ‰ζ•ˆη”Ÿζˆζˆζœ¬ζœ€ε°εŒ–θ§£ε†³ζ–Ήζ‘ˆγ€‚
πŸ“ Abstract
We introduce Learned Optimal Inverse Kinematics (LOInK), a method to generate approximately optimal solutions to an inverse kinematics problem. When trained on data consisting of sampled configurations and associated task variables and a given cost function, LOInK learns a bi-Lipschitz invertible mapping from configuration space to a decoupled task/latent space, and moreover, the latent space is structured so as to place cost-minimizing solutions at the origin. This enables efficient sampling of cost-minimizing solutions via a network-inversion algorithm based on operator splitting. We demonstrate the proposed approach on three problems: an illustrative three degree-of-freedom manipulator problem; a quadrupedal climbing robot for which LOInK can generate near-optimal solutions on average 31 times faster and up to 100 times faster than a constrained optimization approach; and a simulated soft actuator as a purely data-driven example, in which LOInK can explicitly generate high-quality solutions, unlike existing generative approaches that require diverse sampling and evaluation of candidate solutions.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Inverse Kinematics
Optimal Solutions
Efficiency
Robotics
Soft Actuators
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Learned Optimal Inverse Kinematics
bi-Lipschitz invertible mapping
operator splitting
cost-minimizing solutions
neural surrogate models
πŸ”Ž Similar Papers
2022-09-19IEEE Transactions on roboticsCitations: 0
πŸ’Ό Related Jobs
No related jobs found.
M
Michael Somerfield
Australian Robotic Inspection and Asset Management (ARIAM) Hub, Australian Centre for Robotics (ACFR), School of Aerospace, Mechanical and Mechatronic Engineering, The University of Sydney, Australia
D
Damian Abood
Australian Robotic Inspection and Asset Management (ARIAM) Hub, Australian Centre for Robotics (ACFR), School of Aerospace, Mechanical and Mechatronic Engineering, The University of Sydney, Australia
R
Ruigang Wang
Australian Robotic Inspection and Asset Management (ARIAM) Hub, Australian Centre for Robotics (ACFR), School of Aerospace, Mechanical and Mechatronic Engineering, The University of Sydney, Australia
Ian R. Manchester
Ian R. Manchester
Professor, University of Sydney. Director, ACFR. Director, ARIAM Hub.
roboticsnonlinear controlsystem identificationrobust machine learning