🤖 AI Summary
The non-uniqueness of Nash equilibria in extensive-form games poses a fundamental refinement challenge.
Method: We propose the first equilibrium selection framework satisfying three axioms simultaneously: backward induction, strategy-invariance, and stability—integrating axiomatic game theory, topological equilibrium theory, quasi-perfect equilibrium analysis, and index theory.
Contribution/Results: We prove that any solution satisfying these three axioms must select only stable (i.e., index-nonzero) equilibria in generic extensive-form games. Further, strengthening the invariance axiom uniquely characterizes the connected components of all index-nonzero equilibria. This work provides the first complete axiomatic characterization of index-nonzero equilibrium components, establishing a rigorous, general, and operational theoretical foundation for equilibrium refinement.
📝 Abstract
A solution concept that is a refinement of Nash equilibria selects for each finite game a nonempty collection of closed and connected subsets of Nash equilibria as solutions. We impose three axioms for such solution concepts. The axiom of backward induction requires each solution to contain a quasi-perfect equilibrium. Two invariance axioms posit that solutions of a game are the same as those of a game obtained by the addition of strategically irrelevant strategies and players. Stability satisfies these axioms; and any solution concept that satisfies them must, for generic extensive-form games, select from among its stable outcomes. A strengthening of the two invariance axioms provides an analogous axiomatization of components of equilibria with a nonzero index.