SafeDrive: Fine-Grained Safety Reasoning for End-to-End Driving in a Sparse World

๐Ÿ“… 2026-02-21
๐Ÿ“ˆ Citations: 0
โœจ Influential: 0
๐Ÿ“„ PDF
๐Ÿค– AI Summary
End-to-end autonomous driving lacks explicit, interpretable safety reasoning mechanisms, limiting its robustness in complex dynamic environments. To address this, this work proposes SafeDrive, a novel framework that introduces, for the first time, a trajectory-conditioned sparse world model. SafeDrive employs an interaction-aware SWNet to construct a sparse environmental representation and leverages FRNet for fine-grained collision risk assessment and temporal drivable area compliance analysis, enabling explicit modeling of critical traffic participantsโ€™ future behaviors and interpretable identification of safety-critical events. Experimental results demonstrate that SafeDrive achieves state-of-the-art performance, attaining 91.6 PDMS and 87.5 EPDMS on NAVSIM with collisions occurring in only 0.5% of scenarios, and a 66.8% driving score on Bench2Drive.

Technology Category

Application Category

๐Ÿ“ Abstract
The end-to-end (E2E) paradigm, which maps sensor inputs directly to driving decisions, has recently attracted significant attention due to its unified modeling capability and scalability. However, ensuring safety in this unified framework remains one of the most critical challenges. In this work, we propose SafeDrive, an E2E planning framework designed to perform explicit and interpretable safety reasoning through a trajectory-conditioned Sparse World Model. SafeDrive comprises two complementary networks: the Sparse World Network (SWNet) and the Fine-grained Reasoning Network (FRNet). SWNet constructs trajectory-conditioned sparse worlds that simulate the future behaviors of critical dynamic agents and road entities, providing interaction-centric representations for downstream reasoning. FRNet then evaluates agent-specific collision risks and temporal adherence to drivable regions, enabling precise identification of safety-critical events across future timesteps. SafeDrive achieves state-of-the-art performance on both open-loop and closed-loop benchmarks. On NAVSIM, it records a PDMS of 91.6 and an EPDMS of 87.5, with only 61 collisions out of 12,146 scenarios (0.5%). On Bench2Drive, SafeDrive attains a 66.8% driving score.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

end-to-end driving
safety reasoning
autonomous driving
collision risk
trajectory planning
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

end-to-end driving
safety reasoning
sparse world model
trajectory-conditioned representation
fine-grained risk assessment
๐Ÿ”Ž Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
J
Jungho Kim
Seoul National University, Republic of Korea
J
Jiyong Oh
Seoul National University, Republic of Korea
S
Seunghoon Yu
Seoul National University, Republic of Korea
H
Hongjae Shin
Seoul National University, Republic of Korea
D
Donghyuk Kwak
Seoul National University, Republic of Korea
Jun Won Choi
Jun Won Choi
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Seoul National University
Artificial intelligenceAutonomous driving robots/vehiclesRobot perceptionSensor fusion