Dimensions of Power: A Systematic Guide to Power Indices for Explainable AI

📅 2026-08-05
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the lack of systematic guidance in selecting power indices within interpretable AI. It proposes a three-dimensional classification framework—individual, coalition-based, and cardinality-based—to systematically categorize power indices from cooperative game theory. Through formal axiomatic analysis and mathematical proofs, the work elucidates their theoretical properties, notably demonstrating that while cardinality-based formulations discard player identity information, they preserve meaningful distinctions among indices. The research clarifies how index characteristics vary across dimensions and validates these insights through illustrative case studies, thereby offering practitioners clear, theoretically grounded criteria for selecting appropriate power indices tailored to specific application contexts.
📝 Abstract
Power indices, originating in cooperative game theory, quantify each player's influence on the outcome of a given game. Originally designed to distribute profits or costs among players and to analyse the fairness of voting systems, power indices have recently gained prominence as methods for attributing outputs of AI-based systems to inputs, thus facilitating explainability. However, selecting the appropriate power index for a given explanation task is an understudied problem. To address this, we organise power indices along three attribution dimensions: single-player, set-based, and cardinality-based. For each dimension, we review the corresponding power indices, generalise existing ones where applicable, and analyse which formal principles they satisfy. We provide proofs for properties that are missing in the literature and show that moving to the cardinality-based setting removes player-identity information while preserving some index-level distinctions. Using concrete examples, we illustrate how the choice of dimension and index affects the resulting attributions in practice, and offer guidance for practitioners seeking to select a suitable power index for a given application context.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

power indices
explainable AI
attribution
cooperative game theory
feature importance
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

power indices
explainable AI
attribution dimensions
cooperative game theory
formal principles