Nudge Before You Push: Physics-Aware Navigation via Tactile Probing

📅 2026-10-04
📈 Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the challenge of erroneous robotic navigation decisions caused by visually similar containers with varying masses. To mitigate this, we propose a "push-before-move" physics-aware safe navigation strategy. Methodologically, a Hall-effect array fingertip sensor is integrated with TacPhys, a force-sequence parsing model, to accurately estimate object mass through minimal-contact light pushing interactions. Furthermore, a repetitive patrol planning algorithm is designed to effectively balance exploration costs against path efficiency. Experimental results demonstrate that the offline mass estimation achieves a mean absolute error as low as 0.28 kg, reducing the missed-push rate to 5.5%. The proposed approach recovers 90% of the optimal path reward, significantly decreasing the need for human intervention during autonomous navigation tasks.
📝 Abstract
Visually identical containers can conceal loads that require different handling decisions. We present TANav, which uses a brief nudge to measure push resistance for navigation under a site-defined handling boundary. TacPhys reads the force sequence, with optional RGB-D and kinematics, into a mass estimate for push authorization. A repeated-patrol planner weighs probe and route costs, requests a second contact when useful, and reuses observations across visits. In simulation, TacPhys approaches a resistance-only Bayes reference and reduces missed pushes from 28.7% to 5.5% relative to peak-force thresholding at comparable low-risk operating points. In repeated-patrol simulation, TANav recovers 90% of the oracle's path saving, more than halves human interventions relative to always-detour, and reduces boundary violations from 4.3% to 2.9% relative to RGB-D-only probing. On a quadruped manipulator with a Hall-array fingertip, offline zero-shot MAE is 0.28-1.07 kg on containers up to 2.82 kg. Force-rise calibration at 3 kg gives 93.5% pooled offline accuracy (86.4% on non-cube episodes); a separate raw-peak rule gives 15 of 20 correct online decisions on unseen boxes.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

tactile probing
physics-aware navigation
mass estimation
push authorization
container handling
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

tactile probing
physics-aware navigation
mass estimation
repeated-patrol planning
zero-shot transfer
🔎 Similar Papers
💼 Related Jobs
No related jobs found.
Xianyao Li
Xianyao Li
University of Florida
Embodied AIRoboticsEmbedded Systems
Fang Xu
Fang Xu
Wuhan University
Image Processing
R
Ruitong Tian
Department of Civil and Coastal Engineering, University of Florida
B
Bowen Sun
Department of Civil and Coastal Engineering, University of Florida
X
Xiao Hu
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Northeastern University
Y
Yang Ye
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Northeastern University
Jing Du
Jing Du
Postdoctoral Research Fellow at University of New South Wales
Recommender SystemBrain Network AnalysisDisease Spread PredicionTime-Series Analysis