Do Tabular Foundation Models Agree with Themselves?

📅 2026-08-06
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This work investigates whether state-of-the-art tabular foundation models (TFMs) adhere to fundamental mathematical properties of joint distributions when performing autoregressive multivariate forecasting. To this end, we introduce two consistency criteria—marginalization consistency and factorization consistency—and develop the first theoretical framework capable of evaluating the internal consistency of TFMs without access to ground-truth posteriors. Empirical evaluations of Transformer-based TFMs across multiple classification and regression datasets reveal that all tested models violate both criteria, producing predictions that cannot correspond to any valid joint distribution. These findings expose a fundamental flaw in current approaches to multivariate prediction with TFMs, highlighting a critical gap between their practical deployment and probabilistic coherence.
📝 Abstract
Tabular Foundation Models (TFMs) are currently the best approach to tabular prediction problems. They are constructed as transformers that approximate the Bayesian posterior predictive distribution based on a pre-training prior. These univariate predictors can be converted into multivariate ones autoregressively by sampling one target and adding it to the features. However, the faithfulness of the resulting joint has not been investigated. Furthermore, TFMs cannot be evaluated against the posterior itself, at least not on real-world datasets, because the ground-truth distribution is unknown. We therefore propose asking a different question: could a model's predictions result from any joint distribution? To answer this question, we pose two requirements that any such model must satisfy. The first is marginalization consistency, which demands that marginalized conditionals are equal to directly predicted marginals. The second is factorization consistency, which demands that different factorization orders result in equal joint distributions. Every TFM that we evaluate violates both of these requirements for both classification and regression across all datasets.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Tabular Foundation Models
marginalization consistency
factorization consistency
joint distribution
autoregressive prediction
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Tabular Foundation Models
marginalization consistency
factorization consistency
autoregressive sampling
joint distribution consistency
💼 Related Jobs
Postdoctoral Fellow – AI-Driven Multi-Omics Integration for Predictive Toxicology
Pfizer
The annual base salary for this position ranges from $64,600.00 to $107,600.00. In addition, this position is eligible for participation in Pfizer’s Global Performance Plan with a bonus target of 7.5% of the base salary. We offer comprehensive and generous benefits and programs to help our colleagues lead healthy lives and to support each of life’s moments. Benefits offered include a 401(k) plan with Pfizer Matching Contributions and an additional Pfizer Retirement Savings Contribution, paid vacation, holiday and personal days, paid caregiver/parental and medical leave, and health benefits to include medical, prescription drug, dental and vision coverage. Learn more at Pfizer Candidate Site – U.S. Benefits | (uscandidates.mypfizerbenefits.com). Pfizer compensation structures and benefit packages are aligned based on the location of hire. The United States salary range provided does not apply to Tampa, FL or any location outside of the United States. Relocation assistance may be available based on business needs and/or eligibility.
Hybrid
C
Christian Klötergens
Institute of Computer Science & VWFS DARC, University of Hildesheim, Hildesheim, Germany
V
Vijaya Krishna Yalavarthi
Institute of Computer Science & VWFS DARC, University of Hildesheim, Hildesheim, Germany
Lars Schmidt-Thieme
Lars Schmidt-Thieme
University of Hildesheim, Germany
machine learning
Tom Hanika
Tom Hanika
Institute of Computer Science, University of Hildesheim
Knowledge DiscoveryUnsupervised Machine LearningExplainable AILatticesFCA